linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] xfs_scrub: lack of kernel support is not a service failure
@ 2018-10-15 16:03 Darrick J. Wong
  2018-10-15 23:05 ` Eric Sandeen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-10-15 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Don't treat a lack of kernel support for scrubbing as an automated
service failure because we have not actually determined that there's
anything wrong with the filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 scrub/xfs_scrub.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
index 33b83a5f..6a0304d2 100644
--- a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
+++ b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
@@ -779,9 +779,15 @@ main(
 	 * for capturing all the log messages if the scrub fails, because the
 	 * fail service uses the service name to gather log messages for the
 	 * error report.
+	 *
+	 * Note: We don't count a lack of kernel support as a service failure
+	 * because we haven't determined that there's anything wrong with the
+	 * filesystem.
 	 */
 	if (is_service) {
 		sleep(2);
+		if (!ctx.scrub_setup_succeeded)
+			return 0;
 		if (ret != SCRUB_RET_SUCCESS)
 			return 1;
 	}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xfs_scrub: lack of kernel support is not a service failure
  2018-10-15 16:03 [PATCH] xfs_scrub: lack of kernel support is not a service failure Darrick J. Wong
@ 2018-10-15 23:05 ` Eric Sandeen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2018-10-15 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong, Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs



On 10/15/18 11:03 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Don't treat a lack of kernel support for scrubbing as an automated
> service failure because we have not actually determined that there's
> anything wrong with the filesystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

makes sense to me

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

> ---
>  scrub/xfs_scrub.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> index 33b83a5f..6a0304d2 100644
> --- a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> +++ b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> @@ -779,9 +779,15 @@ main(
>  	 * for capturing all the log messages if the scrub fails, because the
>  	 * fail service uses the service name to gather log messages for the
>  	 * error report.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note: We don't count a lack of kernel support as a service failure
> +	 * because we haven't determined that there's anything wrong with the
> +	 * filesystem.
>  	 */
>  	if (is_service) {
>  		sleep(2);
> +		if (!ctx.scrub_setup_succeeded)
> +			return 0;
>  		if (ret != SCRUB_RET_SUCCESS)
>  			return 1;
>  	}
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-16  6:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-15 16:03 [PATCH] xfs_scrub: lack of kernel support is not a service failure Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-15 23:05 ` Eric Sandeen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).