From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix shared extent data corruption due to missing cow reservation
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:08:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113170819.15220-1-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
Page writeback indirectly handles shared extents via the existence
of overlapping COW fork blocks. If COW fork blocks exist, writeback
always performs the associated copy-on-write regardless if the
underlying blocks are actually shared. If the blocks are shared,
then overlapping COW fork blocks must always exist.
fstests shared/010 reproduces a case where a buffered write occurs
over a shared block without performing the requisite COW fork
reservation. This ultimately causes writeback to the shared extent
and data corruption that is detected across md5 checks of the
filesystem across a mount cycle.
The problem occurs when a buffered write lands over a shared extent
that crosses an extent size hint boundary and that also happens to
have a partial COW reservation that doesn't cover the start and end
blocks of the data fork extent.
For example, a buffered write occurs across the file offset (in FSB
units) range of [29, 57]. A shared extent exists at blocks [29, 35]
and COW reservation already exists at blocks [32, 34]. After
accommodating a COW extent size hint of 32 blocks and the existing
reservation at offset 32, xfs_reflink_reserve_cow() allocates 32
blocks of reservation at offset 0 and returns with COW reservation
across the range of [0, 34]. The associated data fork extent is
still [29, 35], however, which isn't fully covered by the COW
reservation.
This leads to a buffered write at file offset 35 over a shared
extent without associated COW reservation. Writeback eventually
kicks in, performs an overwrite of the underlying shared block and
causes the associated data corruption.
Update xfs_reflink_reserve_cow() to accommodate the fact that a
delalloc allocation request may not fully cover the extent in the
data fork. Trim the data fork extent appropriately, just as is done
for shared extent boundaries and/or existing COW reservations that
happen to overlap the start of the data fork extent. This prevents
shared/010 failures due to data corruption on reflink enabled
filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
This is not fully tested yet beyond verification that it solves the
problem reproduced by shared/010. I'll be running more tests today, but
I'm sending sooner for review and testing due to the nature of the
problem and the fact that it's a fairly isolated change. I'll follow up
if I discover any resulting regressions..
Brian
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index ecdb086bc23e..c56bdbfcf7ae 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ xfs_reflink_reserve_cow(
if (error)
return error;
+ xfs_trim_extent(imap, got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
trace_xfs_reflink_cow_alloc(ip, &got);
return 0;
}
--
2.17.2
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-13 17:08 Brian Foster [this message]
2018-11-15 5:50 ` [PATCH] xfs: fix shared extent data corruption due to missing cow reservation Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-15 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 12:33 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-16 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-16 13:32 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-16 21:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-17 13:33 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-15 9:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 15:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-11-15 15:58 ` Brian Foster
2018-11-15 15:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-11-15 16:10 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113170819.15220-1-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).