From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: fix shared extent data corruption due to missing cow reservation
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:46:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181119134619.16812-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119134619.16812-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Page writeback indirectly handles shared extents via the existence
of overlapping COW fork blocks. If COW fork blocks exist, writeback
always performs the associated copy-on-write regardless if the
underlying blocks are actually shared. If the blocks are shared,
then overlapping COW fork blocks must always exist.
fstests shared/010 reproduces a case where a buffered write occurs
over a shared block without performing the requisite COW fork
reservation. This ultimately causes writeback to the shared extent
and data corruption that is detected across md5 checks of the
filesystem across a mount cycle.
The problem occurs when a buffered write lands over a shared extent
that crosses an extent size hint boundary and that also happens to
have a partial COW reservation that doesn't cover the start and end
blocks of the data fork extent.
For example, a buffered write occurs across the file offset (in FSB
units) range of [29, 57]. A shared extent exists at blocks [29, 35]
and COW reservation already exists at blocks [32, 34]. After
accommodating a COW extent size hint of 32 blocks and the existing
reservation at offset 32, xfs_reflink_reserve_cow() allocates 32
blocks of reservation at offset 0 and returns with COW reservation
across the range of [0, 34]. The associated data fork extent is
still [29, 35], however, which isn't fully covered by the COW
reservation.
This leads to a buffered write at file offset 35 over a shared
extent without associated COW reservation. Writeback eventually
kicks in, performs an overwrite of the underlying shared block and
causes the associated data corruption.
Update xfs_reflink_reserve_cow() to accommodate the fact that a
delalloc allocation request may not fully cover the extent in the
data fork. Trim the data fork extent appropriately, just as is done
for shared extent boundaries and/or existing COW reservations that
happen to overlap the start of the data fork extent. This prevents
shared/010 failures due to data corruption on reflink enabled
filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index bd9135afe3f4..bfa489c8799f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ xfs_reflink_reserve_cow(
if (error)
return error;
+ xfs_trim_extent(imap, got.br_startoff, got.br_blockcount);
trace_xfs_reflink_cow_alloc(ip, &got);
return 0;
}
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 13:46 COW improvements and always_cow support V2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: handle -EAGAIN from xfs_iomap_write_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: avoid an extent tree lookup in xfs_iomap_write_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: make xfs_bmbt_to_iomap more useful Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't use delalloc extents for COW on files with extsize hints Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: merge COW handling into xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: report IOMAP_F_SHARED from xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: make COW fork unwritten extent conversions more robust Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 13:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: introduce an always_cow mode Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-25 13:39 ` COW improvements and always_cow support V2 Chandan Rajendra
2018-11-26 11:42 ` Chandan Rajendra
2018-11-28 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181119134619.16812-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).