linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] xfs: fix transient reference count error in xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:48:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120224846.GG6792@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119210459.8506-4-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:04:55AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> When retrying a failed inode or dquot buffer,
> xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers() clears all the failed flags from
> the inde/dquot log items. In doing so, it also drops all the
> reference counts on the buffer that the failed log items hold. This
> means it can drop all the active references on the buffer and hence
> free the buffer before it queues it for write again.
> 
> Putting the buffer on the delwri queue takes a reference to the
> buffer (so that it hangs around until it has been written and
> completed), but this goes bang if the buffer has already been freed.
> 
> Hence we need to add the buffer to the delwri queue before we remove
> the failed flags from the log items attached to the buffer to ensure
> it always remains referenced during the resubmit process.
> 
> Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> index 12d8455bfbb2..010db5f8fb00 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> @@ -1233,9 +1233,23 @@ xfs_buf_iodone(
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Requeue a failed buffer for writeback
> + * Requeue a failed buffer for writeback.
>   *
> - * Return true if the buffer has been re-queued properly, false otherwise
> + * We clear the log item failed state here as well, but we have to be careful
> + * about reference counts because the only active reference counts on the buffer
> + * may be the failed log items. Hence if we clear the log item failed state
> + * before queuing the buffer for IO we can release all active references to
> + * the buffer and free it, leading to use after free problems in
> + * xfs_buf_delwri_queue. It makes no difference to the buffer or log items which
> + * order we process them in - the buffer is locked, and we own the buffer list
> + * so nothing on them is going to change while we are performing this action.
> + *
> + * Hence we can safely queue the buffer for IO before we clear the failed log
> + * item state, therefore  always having an active reference to the buffer and
> + * avoiding the transient zero-reference state that leads to use-after-free.
> + *
> + * Return true if the buffer was added to the buffer list, false if it was
> + * already on the buffer list.
>   */
>  bool
>  xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers(
> @@ -1243,16 +1257,16 @@ xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers(
>  	struct list_head	*buffer_list)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_log_item	*lip;
> +	bool			ret;
> +
> +	ret = xfs_buf_delwri_queue(bp, buffer_list);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Clear XFS_LI_FAILED flag from all items before resubmit
> -	 *
> -	 * XFS_LI_FAILED set/clear is protected by ail_lock, caller  this
> +	 * XFS_LI_FAILED set/clear is protected by ail_lock, caller of this
>  	 * function already have it acquired
>  	 */
>  	list_for_each_entry(lip, &bp->b_li_list, li_bio_list)
>  		xfs_clear_li_failed(lip);
>  
> -	/* Add this buffer back to the delayed write list */
> -	return xfs_buf_delwri_queue(bp, buffer_list);
> +	return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-21  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-19 21:04 [PATCH 0/7] xfs: various fixes for 4.20 Dave Chinner
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: zero length symlinks are not valid Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 13:44   ` Brian Foster
2018-11-20 21:19     ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-21 12:01       ` Brian Foster
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: uncached buffer tracing needs to print bno Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: fix transient reference count error in xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:48   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: finobt AG reserves don't consider last AG can be a runt Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: extent shifting doesn't fully invalidate page cache Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: don't ENOSPC on writeback when punching holes Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20  9:50     ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-20 16:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 21:00         ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-21 18:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-22  2:31     ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-19 21:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: flush removing page cache in xfs_reflink_remap_prep Dave Chinner
2018-11-20  8:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-20  6:36 ` [PATCH 8/7] xfs: delalloc -> unwritten COW fork allocation can go wrong Dave Chinner
2018-11-20 13:45   ` Brian Foster
2018-11-20 16:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 21:08       ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-20 16:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 22:58   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120224846.GG6792@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).