public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: cache minimum realtime summary level
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:33:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126173347.GB17512@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95c54025014c6d5d3944924b52637cdc2b50cf4e.1542137269.git.osandov@fb.com>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:28:59AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> 
> The realtime summary is a two-dimensional array on disk, effectively:
> 
> u32 rsum[log2(number of realtime extents) + 1][number of blocks in the bitmap]
> 
> rsum[log][bbno] is the number of extents of size 2**log which start in
> bitmap block bbno.
> 
> xfs_rtallocate_extent_near() uses xfs_rtany_summary() to check whether
> rsum[log][bbno] != 0 for any log level. However, the summary array is
> stored in row-major order (i.e., like an array in C), so all of these
> entries are not adjacent, but rather spread across the entire summary
> file. In the worst case (a full bitmap block), xfs_rtany_summary() has
> to check every level.
> 
> This means that on a moderately-used realtime device, an allocation will
> waste a lot of time finding, reading, and releasing buffers for the
> realtime summary. In particular, one of our storage services (which runs
> on servers with 8 very slow CPUs and 15 8 TB XFS realtime filesystems)
> spends almost 5% of its CPU cycles in xfs_rtbuf_get() and
> xfs_trans_brelse() called from xfs_rtany_summary().
> 
> One solution would be to also store the summary with the dimensions
> swapped. However, this would require a disk format change to a very old
> component of XFS.
> 
> Instead, we can cache the minimum size which contains any extents. We do
> so lazily; rather than guaranteeing that the cache contains the precise
> minimum, it always contains a loose lower bound which we tighten when we
> read or update a summary block. This only uses a few kilobytes of memory
> and is already serialized via the realtime bitmap and summary inode
> locks, so the cost is minimal. With this change, the same workload only
> spends 0.2% of its CPU cycles in the realtime allocator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
> Based on Linus' master branch.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - Allow the cache allocation to fail, in which case we just don't use it
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - Clarify comment in xfs_rtmount_inodes().
> - Use kmem_* instead of kvmalloc/kvfree
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c |  6 ++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h           |  7 +++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Ping.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-13 19:28 [PATCH v3] xfs: cache minimum realtime summary level Omar Sandoval
2018-11-26 17:33 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-11-26 22:57 ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181126173347.GB17512@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox