From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] generic/050: fix ro blockdev mount of xfs with quota
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:03:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128030346.GP3889@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127231955.GA8115@magnolia>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:19:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:32:36PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 04:19:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > In XFS, mounting with quota always require a writable device. If the
> > > block device is read only, the mount fails, which fails this test.
> > > Since this is expected, work around this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/generic/050 | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/050 b/tests/generic/050
> > > index 90e924db..33da228d 100755
> > > --- a/tests/generic/050
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/050
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,21 @@ _require_norecovery
> > >
> > > _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
> > >
> > > +filter_ro_mount() {
> > > + local arg=""
> > > +
> > > + # Mounting with quota on XFS requires a writable fs, which means
> > > + # we fail the ro blockdev test with with EPERM.
> > > + if [ "$FSTYP" = "xfs" ] && echo "$MOUNT_OPTIONS" | grep -q quota ; then
> > > + arg="s|mount: $SCRATCH_MNT: permission denied|mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only|g"
> > > + fi
> > > + sed -e "$arg" | _filter_ro_mount
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +filter_umount() {
> > > + sed -e "\|umount: $SCRATCH_DEV: not mounted.|d" | _filter_scratch
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > #
> > > # Mark the device read-only
> > > #
> > > @@ -46,7 +61,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV
> > > # Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again
> > > #
> > > echo "mounting read-only block device:"
> > > -_try_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount
> > > +_try_scratch_mount 2>&1 | filter_ro_mount
> > >
> > > echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)"
> > > touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> >
> > This touch expects a failure message, but with this change applied, test
> > still failed when testing with "-o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota" mount
> > options as
> >
> > --- tests/generic/050.out 2018-07-01 20:36:05.796146192 +0800
> > +++ /root/workspace/xfstests/results//generic/050.out.bad 2018-11-04 23:25:34.551700377 +0800
> > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> > mounting read-only block device:
> > mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only
> > touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)
> > -touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system
>
> Hmm, what kernel is this on? I've never seen this problem, but maybe I
> just have too many patches everywhere. :/
I cannot remember.. But I think the problem here is that, ro mount with
quota failed but we amended & hid the failure by filter_ro_mount, then
the 'touch' expected a ro-mounted fs, but it actually created a new file
on rootfs without hitting the EROFS error.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-01 23:19 [PATCH 0/8] fstests: fix quota failures on xfs Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] quota: clean out speculative preallocations when checking quota usage Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: force unlink metadata updates to disk Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] generic/050: fix ro blockdev mount of xfs with quota Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-04 15:32 ` Eryu Guan
2018-11-27 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-28 3:03 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-11-28 3:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] dump: don't fail if multi-file dumps don't all contain quota info Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs/266: fix restore summary counter when quotas are enabled Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs/205: update for v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] misc: force the exact quota options coded into the test Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: filter out mount options that don't work on v4 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-04 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] fstests: fix quota failures on xfs Eryu Guan
2018-11-06 4:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181128030346.GP3889@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).