linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove xfs_trim_extent_eof
Date: Mon,  3 Dec 2018 17:24:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203222503.30649-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203222503.30649-1-hch@lst.de>

Opencoding this function in the only caller makes it blindly obvious
what is going on instead of having to look at two files for that.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 11 -----------
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h |  1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c        |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 19e921d1586f..f16d42abc500 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -3685,17 +3685,6 @@ xfs_trim_extent(
 	}
 }
 
-/* trim extent to within eof */
-void
-xfs_trim_extent_eof(
-	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*irec,
-	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
-
-{
-	xfs_trim_extent(irec, 0, XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount,
-					      i_size_read(VFS_I(ip))));
-}
-
 /*
  * Trim the returned map to the required bounds
  */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
index 488dc8860fd7..f9a925caa70e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec)
 
 void	xfs_trim_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, xfs_fileoff_t bno,
 		xfs_filblks_t len);
-void	xfs_trim_extent_eof(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *, struct xfs_inode *);
 int	xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int rsvd);
 int	xfs_bmap_set_attrforkoff(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int *version);
 void	xfs_bmap_local_to_extents_empty(struct xfs_inode *ip, int whichfork);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 338b9d9984e0..d7275075878e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
 	 * mechanism to protect us from arbitrary extent modifying contexts, not
 	 * just eofblocks.
 	 */
-	xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
+	xfs_trim_extent(&wpc->imap, 0, XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, i_size_read(inode)));
 
 	/*
 	 * COW fork blocks can overlap data fork blocks even if the blocks
-- 
2.19.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-03 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03 22:24 COW improvements and always_cow support V3 Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 22:24 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-12-18 21:45   ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove xfs_trim_extent_eof Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the io_type field from the writeback context and ioend Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 21:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remove the s_maxbytes checks in xfs_map_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 22:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: rework the truncate race handling in the writeback path Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 23:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: make xfs_bmbt_to_iomap more useful Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 21:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: don't use delalloc extents for COW on files with extsize hints Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 21:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-19 19:32       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: also truncate holes covered by COW blocks Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 23:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: merge COW handling into xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 23:36   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-19 20:20       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 22:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: report IOMAP_F_SHARED from xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 23:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 22:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: make COW fork unwritten extent conversions more robust Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 22:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 22:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: introduce an always_cow mode Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-18 23:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19 19:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-19 22:43     ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-20  7:07       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-20 21:03         ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-21  6:27           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-06  1:05 ` COW improvements and always_cow support V3 Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-06  4:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-06 16:32     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-06 20:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 17:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-18 18:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-19  0:44         ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-20  7:09           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-20 22:09             ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-17 16:36 COW improvements and always_cow support V4 Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 16:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove xfs_trim_extent_eof Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 16:21 COW improvements and always_cow support V3 Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 16:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove xfs_trim_extent_eof Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181203222503.30649-2-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).