From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:60454 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726350AbeLKN6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:58:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:58:18 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for v4.20-rc6 Message-ID: <20181211135818.GA29626@infradead.org> References: <20181208163639.GR24487@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Al Viro , david@fromorbit.com, Linux List Kernel Mailing , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Honestly, I really wish you simply wouldn't send me "xfs" fixes that > aren't really xfs-specific at all. > > All the splice patches (and honestly, I feel some of the iomap ones > too) that have come in through the xfs tree should have been handled > separately as actual VFS patches. Or at least had acks from Al or > something. iomap came in through the XFS tree originally, and has been very much maintained in combo, even though we now have another user with gfs. Maybe we just need to make that official in MAINTAINERS?