From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: swapext replay fixes
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:31:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218193134.GI27208@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81b35377-47d9-2421-ba5c-537ac6c8c021@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:59:15PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> We've seen 2 reports of an oops on log replay after a swapext, which
> look something like:
>
> [ 63.188907] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004
> [ 63.196774] IP: [<ffffffffc093e5e6>] xfs_bmbt_init_cursor+0x46/0x180 [xfs]
> ...
> [ 63.309769] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffc093e5e6>] [<ffffffffc093e5e6>] xfs_bmbt_init_cursor+0x46/0x180 [xfs]
> [ 63.319132] RSP: 0018:ffff951b4d2977d0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> [ 63.324443] RAX: ffff951b4df63440 RBX: ffff951ba8a48000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 63.331570] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff951b4df63518
> [ 63.338689] RBP: ffff951b4d2977f8 R08: 000000000001e2f0 R09: ffff951b4df63440
> [ 63.345818] R10: ffff951afa403800 R11: ffffffffffffffe0 R12: ffff951b4d0a3000
> [ 63.352949] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff951ba8a48040
> [ 63.360079] FS: 00007f72bcd1f880(0000) GS:ffff951bafc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 63.368160] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [ 63.373893] CR2: 0000000000000004 CR3: 0000000128d8a000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
> [ 63.381029] Call Trace:
> [ 63.383541] [<ffffffffc093e7f7>] xfs_bmbt_change_owner+0x27/0x70 [xfs]
> [ 63.390225] [<ffffffffc09941a3>] xfs_recover_inode_owner_change.isra.26+0xa3/0xc0 [xfs]
> [ 63.398351] [<ffffffffc0995b9c>] xlog_recover_inode_pass2+0x4cc/0x9d0 [xfs]
> [ 63.405460] [<ffffffffc0990018>] ? xfs_efi_release+0x58/0x80 [xfs]
> [ 63.411763] [<ffffffffc0996192>] xlog_recover_commit_pass2+0xf2/0x1a0 [xfs]
> [ 63.418848] [<ffffffffc0996289>] xlog_recover_items_pass2+0x49/0x70 [xfs]
> [ 63.425769] [<ffffffffc09964c5>] xlog_recover_commit_trans+0x215/0x250 [xfs]
> ...
>
> I can reproduce this with a hacky script that can be cleaned up and turned into
> an xfstest:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> DEV=/dev/sdZ1
>
> umount $DEV
> mkfs.xfs -f $DEV
>
> mkdir -p /mnt/test
> mount $DEV /mnt/test
>
> for I in `seq 4194304 -4096 0`; do
> ((I % 12288)) || continue
> xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite $I 4096" /mnt/test/fragfile
> done
>
> xfs_fsr -v /mnt/test/fragfile
>
>
> xfs_io -c "truncate 0" /mnt/test/fragfile
>
> for I in `seq 32768 -4096 0`; do
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite $I 4096" /mnt/test/fragfile
> done
>
> sync
>
> xfs_io -x -c shutdown /mnt/test
> umount /mnt/test
> mount $DEV /mnt/test
...which I assume is going to show up on fstests shortly, right? :)
--D
> ====
>
> The upshot is that if we successfully fsr a file and it remains in btree format,
> then it changes to non-btree format and we crash, log replay will still try to
> do xfs_bmbt_change_owner which will oops if we're not in btree format.
>
> Patches to fix this follow. Lightly tested. Thanks to dave for talking
> through this one with me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 18:59 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: swapext replay fixes Eric Sandeen
2018-12-18 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: handle bad flags in xfs_recover_inode_owner_change Eric Sandeen
2018-12-18 19:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-18 19:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-12-18 19:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-18 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: clear XFS_ILOG_[AD]OWNER for non-btree formats Eric Sandeen
2018-12-18 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-18 19:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-12-18 19:31 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-12-18 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] xfs: swapext replay fixes Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181218193134.GI27208@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox