From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:39818 "EHLO mail-qt1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731280AbeLTSjs (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:39:48 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id n21so2930327qtl.6 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lud1.home ([189.115.213.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20sm5236020qtp.54.2018.12.20.10.39.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:39:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:39:43 -0200 From: Luciano ES Subject: Re: Same size drive has less usable space Message-ID: <20181220163943.5d8c6c2c@lud1.home> In-Reply-To: <710b005e-0738-b793-3014-2234fcee84ad@sandeen.net> References: <20181220131305.2a84b717@lud1.home> <6ab0a568-4732-905a-d45d-209f4bb0cfb0@sandeen.net> <20181220145529.1292ec61@lud1.home> <710b005e-0738-b793-3014-2234fcee84ad@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:32:33 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > but ok, I missed that you had 2k blocks on your backup disk.... I > don't really know what you're trying to do here, TBH. Smaller blocks waste less space. In ext3/4, I've always used 2k or even 1k blocks. It does save space. Doesn't it in XFS too? -- Luciano ES >>