From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: never try to scrub more than 64 inodes per inobt record
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:30:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104183055.GC16751@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154630851366.14372.14057534574140159776.stgit@magnolia>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:08:33PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Make sure we never check more than XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK inodes for any
> given inobt record since there can be more than one inobt record mapped
> to an inode cluster.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> index 882dc56c5c21..fd431682db0b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ xchk_iallocbt_check_freemask(
> int error = 0;
>
> /* Make sure the freemask matches the inode records. */
> - nr_inodes = mp->m_inodes_per_cluster;
> + nr_inodes = min_t(unsigned int, XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK,
> + mp->m_inodes_per_cluster);
>
I'm wondering why we wouldn't also use nr_inodes in the loop immediately
below instead of ->m_inodes_per_cluster, but it looks like this all
changes in the following patches.
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> for (agino = irec->ir_startino;
> agino < irec->ir_startino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-01 2:08 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: inode scrubber fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: never try to scrub more than 64 inodes per inobt record Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-02 12:39 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-01-02 13:30 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-01-04 18:30 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: check the ir_startino alignment directly Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-04 20:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-07 13:45 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 1:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-08 12:47 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-08 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: check inobt record alignment on big block filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: hoist inode cluster checks out of loop Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: clean up the inode cluster checking in the inobt scrub Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:32 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-04 22:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: scrub big block inode btrees correctly Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:38 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-05 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-07 13:45 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 2:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: abort xattr scrub if fatal signals are pending Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: scrub should flag dir/attr offsets that aren't mappable with xfs_dablk_t Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-04 23:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104183055.GC16751@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).