From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: check the ir_startino alignment directly
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:31:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104183104.GD16751@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154630851978.14372.12986942629611980027.stgit@magnolia>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:08:39PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> In xchk_iallocbt_rec, check the alignment of ir_startino by converting
> the inode cluster block alignment into units of inodes instead of the
> other way around (converting ir_startino to blocks). This prevents us
> from tripping over off-by-one errors in ir_startino which are obscured
> by the inode -> block conversion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> index fd431682db0b..5082331d6c03 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,42 @@ xchk_iallocbt_check_freemask(
> return error;
> }
>
> +/* Make sure this inode btree record is aligned properly. */
> +STATIC void
> +xchk_iallocbt_rec_alignment(
> + struct xchk_btree *bs,
> + struct xfs_inobt_rec_incore *irec)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = bs->sc->mp;
> +
> + /*
> + * finobt records have different positioning requirements than inobt
> + * records: each finobt record must have a corresponding inobt record.
> + * That is checked in the xref function, so for now we only catch the
> + * obvious case where the record isn't even chunk-aligned.
> + *
> + * Note also that if a fs block contains more than a single chunk of
> + * inodes, we will have finobt records only for those chunks containing
> + * free inodes.
> + */
> + if (bs->cur->bc_btnum == XFS_BTNUM_FINO) {
> + if (irec->ir_startino & (XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK - 1))
> + xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> + return;
> + }
Is the above really a finobt only check? Couldn't we run this
sanity check against all records and skip the following for finobt?
Otherwise seems fine:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> +
> + /* inobt records must be aligned to cluster and inoalignmnt size. */
> + if (irec->ir_startino & (mp->m_cluster_align_inodes - 1)) {
> + xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (irec->ir_startino & (mp->m_inodes_per_cluster - 1)) {
> + xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* Scrub an inobt/finobt record. */
> STATIC int
> xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> @@ -277,7 +313,6 @@ xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> uint64_t holes;
> xfs_agnumber_t agno = bs->cur->bc_private.a.agno;
> xfs_agino_t agino;
> - xfs_agblock_t agbno;
> xfs_extlen_t len;
> int holecount;
> int i;
> @@ -304,11 +339,9 @@ xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> goto out;
> }
>
> - /* Make sure this record is aligned to cluster and inoalignmnt size. */
> - agbno = XFS_AGINO_TO_AGBNO(mp, irec.ir_startino);
> - if ((agbno & (mp->m_cluster_align - 1)) ||
> - (agbno & (mp->m_blocks_per_cluster - 1)))
> - xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> + xchk_iallocbt_rec_alignment(bs, &irec);
> + if (bs->sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT)
> + goto out;
>
> iabt->inodes += irec.ir_count;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-01 2:08 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: inode scrubber fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: never try to scrub more than 64 inodes per inobt record Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-02 12:39 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-01-02 13:30 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-01-04 18:30 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: check the ir_startino alignment directly Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-01-04 20:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-07 13:45 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 1:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-08 12:47 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-08 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: check inobt record alignment on big block filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: hoist inode cluster checks out of loop Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: clean up the inode cluster checking in the inobt scrub Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:32 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-04 22:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: scrub big block inode btrees correctly Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:38 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-05 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-07 13:45 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-08 2:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: abort xattr scrub if fatal signals are pending Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-01 2:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: scrub should flag dir/attr offsets that aren't mappable with xfs_dablk_t Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 18:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-04 23:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104183104.GD16751@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).