From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
suyanjun218@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: correct statx's result_mask value
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:52:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107175229.GJ12689@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546854790-5233-1-git-send-email-suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:53:10AM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
> For statx syscall, xfs return the wrong result_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index f48ffd7..3811457 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -521,6 +521,9 @@ xfs_vn_getattr(
> stat->btime.tv_nsec = ip->i_d.di_crtime.t_nsec;
> }
> }
> +
> + /* Only return mask that we care */
> + stat->result_mask &= request_mask;
Why not just:
stat->result_mask = STATX_BASIC_STATS;
at the top of the function?
I don't see the need to mask off result_mask at all, since we could some
day elect to return more than what's in request_mask...
...waitaminute, are you seeing garbage in the result_mask that's
returned to userspace? I also noticed the vfs stat functions declare
"struct kstat stat;" without explicitly zeroing the structure fields,
which means (I think) that we can leak stack information if the kernel
isn't built with the stackleak plugin?
--D
>
> if (ip->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_IMMUTABLE)
> stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_IMMUTABLE;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 9:53 [PATCH] xfs: correct statx's result_mask value Su Yanjun
2019-01-07 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-01-07 18:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-07 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2019-01-08 4:58 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2019-01-08 5:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-08 5:15 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2019-01-08 14:11 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190107175229.GJ12689@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suyanjun218@gmail.com \
--cc=suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox