From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove superfluous writeback mapping eof trimming
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:30:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111123032.31538-5-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111123032.31538-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
Now that the cached writeback mapping is explicitly invalidated on
data fork changes, the EOF trimming band-aid is no longer necessary.
Remove xfs_trim_extent_eof() as well since it has no other users.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 11 -----------
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h | 1 -
fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 15 ---------------
3 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 332eefa2700b..4c73927819c2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -3685,17 +3685,6 @@ xfs_trim_extent(
}
}
-/* trim extent to within eof */
-void
-xfs_trim_extent_eof(
- struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec,
- struct xfs_inode *ip)
-
-{
- xfs_trim_extent(irec, 0, XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount,
- i_size_read(VFS_I(ip))));
-}
-
/*
* Trim the returned map to the required bounds
*/
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
index 09d3ea97cc15..b4ff710d7250 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec)
void xfs_trim_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, xfs_fileoff_t bno,
xfs_filblks_t len);
-void xfs_trim_extent_eof(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *, struct xfs_inode *);
int xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int rsvd);
int xfs_bmap_set_attrforkoff(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int *version);
void xfs_bmap_local_to_extents_empty(struct xfs_inode *ip, int whichfork);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 33a1be5df99f..8cc0c31d18b6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -319,19 +319,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
bool imap_valid;
int error = 0;
- /*
- * We have to make sure the cached mapping is within EOF to protect
- * against eofblocks trimming on file release leaving us with a stale
- * mapping. Otherwise, a page for a subsequent file extending buffered
- * write could get picked up by this writeback cycle and written to the
- * wrong blocks.
- *
- * Note that what we really want here is a generic mapping invalidation
- * mechanism to protect us from arbitrary extent modifying contexts, not
- * just eofblocks.
- */
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
-
/*
* COW fork blocks can overlap data fork blocks even if the blocks
* aren't shared. COW I/O always takes precedent, so we must always
@@ -452,7 +439,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
}
wpc->imap = imap;
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
trace_xfs_map_blocks_found(ip, offset, count, wpc->io_type, &imap);
return 0;
allocate_blocks:
@@ -464,7 +450,6 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
ASSERT(whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK || cow_fsb == NULLFILEOFF ||
imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount <= cow_fsb);
wpc->imap = imap;
- xfs_trim_extent_eof(&wpc->imap, ip);
trace_xfs_map_blocks_alloc(ip, offset, count, wpc->io_type, &imap);
return 0;
}
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-11 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 12:30 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: properly invalidate cached writeback mapping Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: eof trim writeback mapping as soon as it is cached Brian Foster
2019-01-16 13:35 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-16 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: update fork seq counter on data fork changes Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: validate writeback mapping using data fork seq counter Brian Foster
2019-01-13 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-14 20:57 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-15 11:26 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 16:35 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 17:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-01-11 13:31 ` [PATCH] tests/generic: test writepage cached mapping validity Brian Foster
2019-01-14 9:30 ` Eryu Guan
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-15 3:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190111123032.31538-5-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).