From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: eof trim writeback mapping as soon as it is cached
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:10:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116141000.GA29871@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116133539.7BD5620675@mail.kernel.org>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:35:38PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 40214d128e07 xfs: trim writepage mapping to within eof.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150.
>
> v4.20.2: Build OK!
> v4.19.15: Build OK!
> v4.14.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 2d5f4b5bebcc ("xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_writepage_map")
> 5c665e5b5af6 ("xfs: remove xfs_map_cow")
> 70c57dcd606f ("xfs: skip CoW writes past EOF when writeback races with truncate")
> a7b28f72ab90 ("xfs: don't use XFS_BMAPI_IGSTATE in xfs_map_blocks")
> b4d8ad7fd3a1 ("xfs: fix s_maxbytes overflow problems")
>
> v4.9.150: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 08438b1e386b ("xfs: plumb in needed functions for range querying of the freespace btrees")
> 092d5d9d5812 ("xfs: cleanup xfs_reflink_find_cow_mapping")
> 11ef38afe98c ("xfs: make xfs btree stats less huge")
> 2d5f4b5bebcc ("xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_writepage_map")
> 5c665e5b5af6 ("xfs: remove xfs_map_cow")
> 70c57dcd606f ("xfs: skip CoW writes past EOF when writeback races with truncate")
> 755c7bf5ddca ("libxfs: convert ushort to unsigned short")
> a7b28f72ab90 ("xfs: don't use XFS_BMAPI_IGSTATE in xfs_map_blocks")
> af7d20fd83d9 ("xfs: make xfs_btree_magic more generic")
> b4d8ad7fd3a1 ("xfs: fix s_maxbytes overflow problems")
> c8ce540db5f6 ("xfs: remove double-underscore integer types")
> cae028df5344 ("xfs: optimise CRC updates")
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
The writeback code in XFS has seen a decent amount of rework since these
older kernels. I'm not quite sure how stable deals with these conflicts,
but for reference, I think the appended (untested) diff is essentially
equivalent for the above two kernels. It doesn't cover the xfs_map_cow()
case in 4.14, but that code is experimental. Also note that the upstream
patch is still technically not reviewed.
Brian
--- 8< ---
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index b0cccf8a81a8..b93b3064de20 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -421,8 +421,10 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
(!nimaps || isnullstartblock(imap->br_startblock))) {
error = xfs_iomap_write_allocate(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset,
imap);
- if (!error)
+ if (!error) {
trace_xfs_map_blocks_alloc(ip, offset, count, type, imap);
+ xfs_trim_extent_eof(imap, ip);
+ }
return error;
}
@@ -433,8 +435,10 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
ASSERT(imap->br_startblock != DELAYSTARTBLOCK);
}
#endif
- if (nimaps)
+ if (nimaps) {
trace_xfs_map_blocks_found(ip, offset, count, type, imap);
+ xfs_trim_extent_eof(imap, ip);
+ }
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 12:30 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: properly invalidate cached writeback mapping Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: eof trim writeback mapping as soon as it is cached Brian Foster
2019-01-16 13:35 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-16 14:10 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: update fork seq counter on data fork changes Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: validate writeback mapping using data fork seq counter Brian Foster
2019-01-13 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-14 20:57 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-15 11:26 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 16:35 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 17:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-11 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove superfluous writeback mapping eof trimming Brian Foster
2019-01-11 13:31 ` [PATCH] tests/generic: test writepage cached mapping validity Brian Foster
2019-01-14 9:30 ` Eryu Guan
2019-01-14 15:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-15 3:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190116141000.GA29871@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox