From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] xfs: refactor the predicate part of xfs_free_eofblocks
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:33:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117173357.GB4424@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111190547.GB33275@bfoster>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:05:47PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:17:03PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Refactor the part of _free_eofblocks that decides if it's really going
> > to truncate post-EOF blocks into a separate helper function. The
> > upcoming deferred inode inactivation patch requires us to be able to
> > decide this prior to actual inactivation. No functionality changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 32 +++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1
> > 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index c8bf02be0003..662ee537ffb5 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@ -3568,3 +3568,35 @@ xfs_irele(
> > trace_xfs_irele(ip, _RET_IP_);
> > iput(VFS_I(ip));
> > }
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Decide if this inode have post-EOF blocks. The caller is responsible
> > + * for knowing / caring about the PREALLOC/APPEND flags.
> > + */
> > +bool
> > +xfs_inode_has_posteof_blocks(
>
> I think something like xfs_has_eofblocks() is more consistent with the
> other related function names (i.e., xfs_free_eofblocks(),
> xfs_can_free_eofblocks(), etc.).
<nod>
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap;
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> > + xfs_fileoff_t end_fsb;
> > + xfs_fileoff_t last_fsb;
> > + xfs_filblks_t map_len;
> > + int nimaps;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, (xfs_ufsize_t)XFS_ISIZE(ip));
> > + last_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, mp->m_super->s_maxbytes);
> > + if (last_fsb <= end_fsb)
> > + return false;
> > + map_len = last_fsb - end_fsb;
> > +
> > + nimaps = 1;
> > + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
> > + error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, end_fsb, map_len, &imap, &nimaps, 0);
> > + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
> > +
> > + return !error && (nimaps != 0) &&
> > + (imap.br_startblock != HOLESTARTBLOCK ||
> > + ip->i_delayed_blks);
>
> I don't think we should be suppressing this error. It's a divergence
> from the current code at least.
Ooh, yeah, good catch. I'll fix that up.
--D
> Brian
>
> > +}
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > index be2014520155..02a938661ba8 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > @@ -499,5 +499,6 @@ extern struct kmem_zone *xfs_inode_zone;
> > #define XFS_DEFAULT_COWEXTSZ_HINT 32
> >
> > bool xfs_inode_verify_forks(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> > +bool xfs_inode_has_posteof_blocks(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> >
> > #endif /* __XFS_INODE_H__ */
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-01 2:16 [PATCH 00/12] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:16 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: free COW staging extents when freezing filesystem Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-11 16:28 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 17:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-17 18:14 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: refactor the predicate part of xfs_free_eofblocks Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-11 19:05 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 17:33 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: decide if inode needs inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: track unlinked inactive inode fs summary counters Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: track unlinked inactive inode quota counters Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: refactor walking of per-AG RECLAIM inodes Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-11 19:06 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-17 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: refactor eofblocks inode match code Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-02 9:50 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-17 18:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: deferred inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: retry fs writes when there isn't space Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: force inactivation before fallocate when space is low Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:17 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: parallelize inode inactivation Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-01 2:18 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: wait for deferred inactivation when destroying unlinked inodes Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-03 12:46 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-17 18:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-17 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190117173357.GB4424@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).