From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: set buffer ops when repair probes for btree type
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:27:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128122736.GA6662@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190127180050.GE4368@magnolia>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:00:50AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> In xrep_findroot_block, we work out the btree type and correctness of a
> given block by calling different btree verifiers on root block
> candidates. However, we leave the NULL b_ops while ->verify_read
> validates the block, which means that if the verifier calls
> xfs_buf_verifier_error it'll crash on the null b_ops. Fix it to set
> b_ops before calling the verifier and unsetting it if the verifier
> fails.
>
> Furthermore, improve the documentation around xfs_buf_ensure_ops, which
> is the function that is responsible for cleaning up the b_ops state of
> buffers that go through xrep_findroot_block but don't match anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 11 ++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> index 1c8eecfe52b8..6acf1bfa0bfe 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> @@ -768,18 +768,23 @@ xrep_findroot_block(
> if (!uuid_equal(&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid,
> &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid))
> goto out;
> + /*
> + * Read verifiers can reference b_ops, so we set the pointer
> + * here. If the verifier fails we'll reset the buffer state
> + * to what it was before we touched the buffer.
> + */
> + bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
> fab->buf_ops->verify_read(bp);
> if (bp->b_error) {
> + bp->b_ops = NULL;
> bp->b_error = 0;
> goto out;
> }
>
> /*
> * Some read verifiers will (re)set b_ops, so we must be
> - * careful not to blow away any such assignment.
> + * careful not to change b_ops after running the verifier.
> */
> - if (!bp->b_ops)
> - bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index eedc5e0156ff..3316e444b973 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -776,10 +776,26 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
> }
>
> /*
> + * Set buffer ops on an unchecked buffer and validate it, if possible.
> + *
> * If the caller passed in an ops structure and the buffer doesn't have ops
> * assigned, set the ops and use them to verify the contents. If the contents
> * cannot be verified, we'll clear XBF_DONE. We assume the buffer has no
> * recorded errors and is already in XBF_DONE state.
> + *
> + * Under normal operations, every in-core buffer must have buffer ops assigned
> + * to them when the buffer is read in from disk so that we can validate the
> + * metadata.
> + *
> + * However, there are two scenarios where one can encounter in-core buffers
> + * that don't have buffer ops. The first is during log recovery of buffers on
> + * a V4 filesystem, though these buffers are purged at the end of recovery.
> + *
> + * The other is online repair, which tries to match arbitrary metadata blocks
> + * with btree types in order to find the root. If online repair doesn't match
> + * the buffer with /any/ btree type, the buffer remains in memory in DONE state
> + * with no ops, and a subsequent read_buf call from elsewhere will not set the
> + * ops. This function helps us fix this situation.
> */
> int
> xfs_buf_ensure_ops(
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-27 18:00 [PATCH] xfs: set buffer ops when repair probes for btree type Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-28 12:27 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128122736.GA6662@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox