From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:8217 "EHLO ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727326AbfA2VoJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:44:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:44:05 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [Bug 202441] Possibly vfs cache related replicable xfs regression since 4.19.0 on sata hdd:s Message-ID: <20190129214405.GA4205@dastard> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:19:52PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202441 > > --- Comment #13 from Roger (rogan6710@gmail.com) --- > Considering that rc8 which I believe was released as 4.19.0 did not show any > problems on my 24G machine I must have managed to get a false positive on > 4.19.0. The machine I tested that on has less ram (8G) but I don't know if that > matters. > > Anyhow, after a filthy amount of copying and compiling I can say that > something probably went wrong between 4.19.2, which is ok, and 4.19.3 > which is not, at least on this 9590. Thank you! We crossed streams - I was writing the email suggesting this when, in fact, your were way ahead of me. > I downloaded, compiled, and tested all rc versions, 4.19.{2,3,5,9} and verified > that 4.19.{3,5,9,18} all have the problems described above on the 9590. > All tests were done in console (nomodeset) directly after boot. Ok, I'll have a look at the 4.19.2 -> 4.19.3 history now and see what pops out. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com