linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] FOLD: improve xfs_bmapi_delalloc
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:08:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201160840.GB6532@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190201124655.GB40798@bfoster>

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 07:46:56AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Ok, I see. Hmm.. I'm wondering how accurate the ->total value is in the
> delalloc conversion path. IIUC, the purpose is to try and select an AG
> with enough blocks for the allocation along with the indirect blocks to
> insert into the bmbt. Both of those have been reserved at delalloc res
> time, hence not needed in the tx. The AG selection code uses the max of
> total and the allocation request size, which means that for most
> conversions (> maxlevels) total is a no-op. Shouldn't total reflect the
> full size of the allocation (alloc size + maxlevels) regardless of
> whether the blocks were already "globally reserved?" Note that this is
> existing code and probably not something I would change in this series..

I think the total value in this path is completely bogus.  A while
ago I had a series trying to sort out some of these reservation
issues, but it will take a fair amount of work to get back to that.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31  7:55 make delalloc conversion more robust and clear Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] FOLD: improve xfs_bmapi_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:09   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01  7:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01  7:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46         ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:08           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the io_type field from the writeback context and ioend Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remove the s_maxbytes checks in xfs_map_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: don't try to map blocks beyond i_size in writeback Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01  7:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46       ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: simplify the xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: factor out two helpers from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: split XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC handling " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: move transaction handling to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: move stat accounting " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: move xfs_iomap_write_allocate to xfs_aops.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:31   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: retry COW fork delalloc conversion when no extent was found Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190201160840.GB6532@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).