From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfs: hoist unlinked list search and mapping to a separate function
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 14:01:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201190137.GE31203@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154897670777.26065.9017810401812180528.stgit@magnolia>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:18:27PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> There's a loop that searches an unlinked bucket list to find the inode
> that points to a given inode. Hoist this into a separate function;
> later we'll use our iunlink backref cache to bypass the slow list
> operation. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index ea38b66fbc59..d5b3f8fdac7e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -2084,6 +2084,100 @@ xfs_iunlink(
> return error;
> }
>
> +/* Return the imap, dinode pointer, and buffer for an inode. */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_iunlink_map_ino(
> + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> + xfs_ino_t next_ino,
Might be good to clean up some of these variable names as this code gets
factored out. E.g., "next_ino" doesn't mean much more than "ino" in the
context of this helper.
> + struct xfs_imap *imap,
> + struct xfs_dinode **dipp,
> + struct xfs_buf **bpp)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> + int error;
> +
> + imap->im_blkno = 0;
> + error = xfs_imap(mp, tp, next_ino, imap, 0);
> + if (error) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "%s: xfs_imap returned error %d.",
> + __func__, error);
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + error = xfs_imap_to_bp(mp, tp, imap, dipp, bpp, 0, 0);
> + if (error) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "%s: xfs_imap_to_bp returned error %d.",
> + __func__, error);
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Walk the unlinked chain from @head_agino until we find the inode that
> + * points to @target_ino. Return the inode number, map, dinode pointer,
> + * and inode cluster buffer of that inode as @ino, @imap, @dipp, and @bpp.
> + *
> + * Do not call this function if @target_agino is the head of the list.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_iunlink_map_prev(
> + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> + struct xfs_perag *pag,
> + xfs_agino_t head_agino,
> + xfs_agino_t target_agino,
> + xfs_ino_t *ino,
> + struct xfs_imap *imap,
> + struct xfs_dinode **dipp,
> + struct xfs_buf **bpp)
> +{
It would also be nice to have some oneline comments next to the params
of some of these functions.
> + struct xfs_imap last_imap;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> + struct xfs_buf *last_ibp = NULL;
> + struct xfs_dinode *last_dip;
> + xfs_ino_t next_ino = NULLFSINO;
> + xfs_agino_t next_agino;
> + int error;
> +
> + ASSERT(head_agino != target_agino);
> +
> + next_agino = head_agino;
> + while (next_agino != target_agino) {
> + xfs_agino_t unlinked_agino;
> +
> + if (last_ibp)
> + xfs_trans_brelse(tp, last_ibp);
> +
> + next_ino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, pag->pag_agno, next_agino);
> + error = xfs_iunlink_map_ino(tp, next_ino, &last_imap,
> + &last_dip, &last_ibp);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + unlinked_agino = be32_to_cpu(last_dip->di_next_unlinked);
> + if (!xfs_verify_agino(mp, pag->pag_agno, next_agino) ||
Should the next_agino above be unlinked_agino? Also is the == check
below a loop check (comment pls)?
> + next_agino == unlinked_agino) {
> + XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__,
> + XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp,
> + last_dip, sizeof(*last_dip));
> + error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + return error;
> + }
> + next_agino = unlinked_agino;
> + }
> +
> + /* Should never happen, but don't return garbage. */
> + if (next_ino == NULLFSINO)
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +
> + *ino = next_ino;
> + memcpy(imap, &last_imap, sizeof(last_imap));
> + *dipp = last_dip;
> + *bpp = last_ibp;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Pull the on-disk inode from the AGI unlinked list.
> */
> @@ -2153,43 +2247,11 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove(
> } else {
> struct xfs_imap imap;
>
> - /*
> - * We need to search the list for the inode being freed.
> - */
> - last_ibp = NULL;
> - while (next_agino != agino) {
> - if (last_ibp)
> - xfs_trans_brelse(tp, last_ibp);
> -
> - imap.im_blkno = 0;
> - next_ino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, agno, next_agino);
> -
> - error = xfs_imap(mp, tp, next_ino, &imap, 0);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> - "%s: xfs_imap returned error %d.",
> - __func__, error);
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> -
> - error = xfs_imap_to_bp(mp, tp, &imap, &last_dip,
> - &last_ibp, 0, 0);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> - "%s: xfs_imap_to_bp returned error %d.",
> - __func__, error);
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> -
> - next_agino = be32_to_cpu(last_dip->di_next_unlinked);
> - if (!xfs_verify_agino(mp, agno, next_agino)) {
> - XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__,
> - XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp,
> - last_dip, sizeof(*last_dip));
> - error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> - }
> + /* We need to search the list for the inode being freed. */
> + error = xfs_iunlink_map_prev(tp, pag, next_agino, agino,
> + &next_ino, &imap, &last_dip, &last_ibp);
Another variable nit... next_ino is kind of confusing here, particularly
where we still use next_agino as well. The former is actually the "prev"
ino output, right?
Brian
> + if (error)
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> /*
> * Now last_ibp points to the buffer previous to us on the
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: incore unlinked list Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: clean up iunlink functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: track unlinked inode counts in per-ag data Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 18:59 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: refactor AGI unlinked bucket updates Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: strengthen AGI unlinked inode bucket pointer checks Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: refactor inode unlinked pointer update functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 22:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 20:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: hoist unlinked list search and mapping to a separate function Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-02-02 20:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-04 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-04 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 20:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: add tracepoints for high level iunlink operations Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: cache unlinked pointers in an rhashtable Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-02 4:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 19:29 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 7:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] xfs: incore unlinked list Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190201190137.GE31203@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).