From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: refactor AGI unlinked bucket updates
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 11:50:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202195051.GQ5761@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190201190042.GB31203@bfoster>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:18:09PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Split the AGI unlinked bucket updates into a separate function. No
> > functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index 98355f5f9253..3c33136b21ef 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@ -1880,6 +1880,46 @@ xfs_inactive(
> > xfs_qm_dqdetach(ip);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Point the AGI unlinked bucket at an inode and log the results. The caller
> > + * is responsible for validating the old value.
> > + */
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_iunlink_update_bucket(
> > + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > + struct xfs_buf *agibp,
> > + unsigned int bucket_index,
> > + xfs_agino_t new_agino)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_agi *agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(agibp);
> > + xfs_agino_t old_value;
> > + int offset;
> > +
> > + ASSERT(new_agino == NULLAGINO ||
> > + xfs_verify_agino(tp->t_mountp, be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_seqno),
> > + new_agino));
> > +
> > + old_value = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_unlinked[bucket_index]);
> > + trace_xfs_iunlink_update_bucket(tp->t_mountp,
> > + be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_seqno), bucket_index, old_value,
> > + new_agino);
> > +
>
> Might as well pass agno as a param, particularly since the callers
> already have it.
Will fix.
> > + /*
> > + * We should never find the head of the list already set to the value
> > + * passed in because either we're adding or removing ourselves from the
> > + * head of the list.
> > + */
> > + if (old_value == new_agino)
> > + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > +
>
> This seems a little weird in the NULLAGINO case. That probably should
> still never happen, but doesn't seem indicative of corruption on its
> own. *shrug* not a big deal.
<nod> We shouldn't ever be pulling the last item off an unlinked bucket
only to find that the bucket was empty, but if we do then it's a sign
that something has gone seriously wrong with our locking or something.
--D
> Brian
>
> > + agi->agi_unlinked[bucket_index] = cpu_to_be32(new_agino);
> > + offset = offsetof(struct xfs_agi, agi_unlinked) +
> > + (sizeof(xfs_agino_t) * bucket_index);
> > + xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, agibp, offset,
> > + (offset + sizeof(xfs_agino_t) - 1));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * This is called when the inode's link count goes to 0 or we are creating a
> > * tmpfile via O_TMPFILE. In the case of a tmpfile, @ignore_linkcount will be
> > @@ -1958,15 +1998,10 @@ xfs_iunlink(
> > xfs_inobp_check(mp, ibp);
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Point the bucket head pointer at the inode being inserted.
> > - */
> > - ASSERT(agino != 0);
> > - agi->agi_unlinked[bucket_index] = cpu_to_be32(agino);
> > - offset = offsetof(xfs_agi_t, agi_unlinked) +
> > - (sizeof(xfs_agino_t) * bucket_index);
> > - xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, agibp, offset,
> > - (offset + sizeof(xfs_agino_t) - 1));
> > + /* Point the head of the list to point to this inode. */
> > + error = xfs_iunlink_update_bucket(tp, agibp, bucket_index, agino);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > pag->pagi_unlinked_count++;
> >
> > out_unlock:
> > @@ -2062,16 +2097,12 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove(
> > } else {
> > xfs_trans_brelse(tp, ibp);
> > }
> > - /*
> > - * Point the bucket head pointer at the next inode.
> > - */
> > - ASSERT(next_agino != 0);
> > - ASSERT(next_agino != agino);
> > - agi->agi_unlinked[bucket_index] = cpu_to_be32(next_agino);
> > - offset = offsetof(xfs_agi_t, agi_unlinked) +
> > - (sizeof(xfs_agino_t) * bucket_index);
> > - xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, agibp, offset,
> > - (offset + sizeof(xfs_agino_t) - 1));
> > +
> > + /* Point the head of the list to the next unlinked inode. */
> > + error = xfs_iunlink_update_bucket(tp, agibp, bucket_index,
> > + next_agino);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * We need to search the list for the inode being freed.
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > index 6fcc893dfc91..c10478e7e49a 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > @@ -3371,6 +3371,32 @@ DEFINE_TRANS_EVENT(xfs_trans_roll);
> > DEFINE_TRANS_EVENT(xfs_trans_add_item);
> > DEFINE_TRANS_EVENT(xfs_trans_free_items);
> >
> > +TRACE_EVENT(xfs_iunlink_update_bucket,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno, unsigned int bucket,
> > + xfs_agino_t old_ptr, xfs_agino_t new_ptr),
> > + TP_ARGS(mp, agno, bucket, old_ptr, new_ptr),
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(dev_t, dev)
> > + __field(xfs_agnumber_t, agno)
> > + __field(unsigned int, bucket)
> > + __field(xfs_agino_t, old_ptr)
> > + __field(xfs_agino_t, new_ptr)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->dev = mp->m_super->s_dev;
> > + __entry->agno = agno;
> > + __entry->bucket = bucket;
> > + __entry->old_ptr = old_ptr;
> > + __entry->new_ptr = new_ptr;
> > + ),
> > + TP_printk("dev %d:%d agno %u bucket %u old 0x%x new 0x%x",
> > + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> > + __entry->agno,
> > + __entry->bucket,
> > + __entry->old_ptr,
> > + __entry->new_ptr)
> > +);
> > +
> > #endif /* _TRACE_XFS_H */
> >
> > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 23:17 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: incore unlinked list Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: clean up iunlink functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: track unlinked inode counts in per-ag data Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 18:59 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: refactor AGI unlinked bucket updates Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-02-02 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 19:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: strengthen AGI unlinked inode bucket pointer checks Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: refactor inode unlinked pointer update functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 22:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 20:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: hoist unlinked list search and mapping to a separate function Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-02 20:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-04 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-04 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-02 20:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: add tracepoints for high level iunlink operations Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-31 23:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: cache unlinked pointers in an rhashtable Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-01 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-02 4:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 19:29 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 19:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-02 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 7:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] xfs: incore unlinked list Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190202195051.GQ5761@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).