From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:06:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190203091049.GN2713@desktop>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:17:25AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Refactor the kmemleak code to work correctly with sections. This
>
> Thanks for the fix!
>
> > requires changing the report location to use RESULT_DIR instead of
> > RESULT_BASE, and clarifying which functions get used when.
>
> But I didn't see any RESULT_DIR related changes in this patch.
I forgot to update the commit log. :(
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > check | 4 ++--
> > common/rc | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/check b/check
> > index c0eee0aa..b9eb86cb 100755
> > --- a/check
> > +++ b/check
> > @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ _expunge_test()
> > return 0
> > }
> >
> > -_init_kmemleak
> > +_detect_kmemleak
> > _prepare_test_list
> >
> > if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
> > @@ -793,8 +793,8 @@ for section in $HOST_OPTIONS_SECTIONS; do
> > # and log messages that shouldn't be there.
> > _check_filesystems
> > _check_dmesg || err=true
> > - _check_kmemleak || err=true
> > fi
> > + _check_kmemleak || err=true
>
> So we check for kmemleak after each test even when the test already
> failed, better to have some comments here to explain why this is
> necessary.
I'll add this in the next version:
# Scan for memory leaks after every test so that associating
# a leak to a particular test will be as accurate as possible.
> >
> > # test ends after all checks are done.
> > $timestamp && _timestamp
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 19e947df..75771f31 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ _check_dmesg()
> > # capture the kmemleak report
> > _capture_kmemleak()
> > {
> > - local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > + local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
>
> Just wondering why the "{}" are removed in this patch?
Making the variable dereferencing consistent with the rest of fstests.
> > local leak_file="$1"
> >
> > # Tell the kernel to scan for memory leaks. Apparently the write
> > @@ -3535,17 +3535,20 @@ ENDL
> > echo "clear" > "$kern_knob"
> > }
> >
> > -# set up kmemleak
> > -_init_kmemleak()
> > +# Figure out if the running kernel supports kmemleak; if it does, clear out
> > +# anything that leaked before we even started testing. The leak checker only
> > +# needs to be primed like this once per ./check invocation.
> > +_detect_kmemleak()
> > {
> > - local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > + local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > + KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE="/tmp/check_kmemleak"
>
> So we're checking the "/tmp/check_kmemleak" file instead of
Right.
> ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak now, but from the commit log it seems that
> it should be ${RESULT_DIR}/check_kmemleak?
Er... oops. I'll update the changelog. :)
> >
> > # Since kernel v4.19-rc3, the kmemleak knob exists even if kmemleak is
> > # disabled, but returns EBUSY on write. So instead of relying on
> > # existance of writable knob file, we use a test file to indicate that
> > # _check_kmemleak() is enabled only if we actually managed to write to
> > # the knob file.
> > - rm -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > + rm -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> >
> > if [ ! -w "$kern_knob" ]; then
> > return 0
> > @@ -3555,17 +3558,26 @@ _init_kmemleak()
> > # then dump all the leaks recorded so far.
> > if echo "scan=off" > "$kern_knob" 2>/dev/null; then
> > _capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> > - touch ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > + touch "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> > fi
> > }
> >
> > -# check kmemleak log
> > +# Kick the kmemleak checker to scan for leaks. Background leak scan mode is
> > +# not enabled, so we must call the kernel to ask for a scan and deal with the
> > +# results appropriately. This we do after every test completes, whether or not
> > +# it was successful.
> > _check_kmemleak()
> > {
> > - local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > - local leak_file="${seqres}.kmemleak"
> > + local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > + local leak_file="$seqres.kmemleak"
> >
> > - if [ ! -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak ]; then
> > + if [ ! -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE" ]; then
> > + return 0
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # Not enabled, so discard any report of leaks found.
> > + if [ "$USE_KMEMLEAK" != "yes" ]; then
> > + _capture_kmemleak /dev/null
>
> New knob requires new documentation in README :)
Will do. Happy New Year, by the way!
--D
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
> > return 0
> > fi
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 16:17 [PATCH 1/4] xfs/093: make sure the scratch directory still exists after repair Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs/138: format the scratch device before using it Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03 9:10 ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: check for reasonable inode creation time Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03 9:14 ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).