linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:06:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190203091049.GN2713@desktop>

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:17:25AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Refactor the kmemleak code to work correctly with sections.  This
> 
> Thanks for the fix!
> 
> > requires changing the report location to use RESULT_DIR instead of
> > RESULT_BASE, and clarifying which functions get used when.
> 
> But I didn't see any RESULT_DIR related changes in this patch.

I forgot to update the commit log. :(

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  check     |    4 ++--
> >  common/rc |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/check b/check
> > index c0eee0aa..b9eb86cb 100755
> > --- a/check
> > +++ b/check
> > @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ _expunge_test()
> >  	return 0
> >  }
> >  
> > -_init_kmemleak
> > +_detect_kmemleak
> >  _prepare_test_list
> >  
> >  if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
> > @@ -793,8 +793,8 @@ for section in $HOST_OPTIONS_SECTIONS; do
> >  			# and log messages that shouldn't be there.
> >  			_check_filesystems
> >  			_check_dmesg || err=true
> > -			_check_kmemleak || err=true
> >  		fi
> > +		_check_kmemleak || err=true
> 
> So we check for kmemleak after each test even when the test already
> failed, better to have some comments here to explain why this is
> necessary.

I'll add this in the next version:

	# Scan for memory leaks after every test so that associating
	# a leak to a particular test will be as accurate as possible.

> >  
> >  		# test ends after all checks are done.
> >  		$timestamp && _timestamp
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 19e947df..75771f31 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ _check_dmesg()
> >  # capture the kmemleak report
> >  _capture_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> 
> Just wondering why the "{}" are removed in this patch?

Making the variable dereferencing consistent with the rest of fstests.

> >  	local leak_file="$1"
> >  
> >  	# Tell the kernel to scan for memory leaks.  Apparently the write
> > @@ -3535,17 +3535,20 @@ ENDL
> >  	echo "clear" > "$kern_knob"
> >  }
> >  
> > -# set up kmemleak
> > -_init_kmemleak()
> > +# Figure out if the running kernel supports kmemleak; if it does, clear out
> > +# anything that leaked before we even started testing.  The leak checker only
> > +# needs to be primed like this once per ./check invocation.
> > +_detect_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > +	KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE="/tmp/check_kmemleak"
> 
> So we're checking the "/tmp/check_kmemleak" file instead of

Right.

> ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak now, but from the commit log it seems that
> it should be ${RESULT_DIR}/check_kmemleak?

Er... oops.  I'll update the changelog. :)

> >  
> >  	# Since kernel v4.19-rc3, the kmemleak knob exists even if kmemleak is
> >  	# disabled, but returns EBUSY on write. So instead of relying on
> >  	# existance of writable knob file, we use a test file to indicate that
> >  	# _check_kmemleak() is enabled only if we actually managed to write to
> >  	# the knob file.
> > -	rm -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > +	rm -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> >  
> >  	if [ ! -w "$kern_knob" ]; then
> >  		return 0
> > @@ -3555,17 +3558,26 @@ _init_kmemleak()
> >  	# then dump all the leaks recorded so far.
> >  	if echo "scan=off" > "$kern_knob" 2>/dev/null; then
> >  		_capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> > -		touch ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak
> > +		touch "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE"
> >  	fi
> >  }
> >  
> > -# check kmemleak log
> > +# Kick the kmemleak checker to scan for leaks.  Background leak scan mode is
> > +# not enabled, so we must call the kernel to ask for a scan and deal with the
> > +# results appropriately.  This we do after every test completes, whether or not
> > +# it was successful.
> >  _check_kmemleak()
> >  {
> > -	local kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > -	local leak_file="${seqres}.kmemleak"
> > +	local kern_knob="$DEBUGFS_MNT/kmemleak"
> > +	local leak_file="$seqres.kmemleak"
> >  
> > -	if [ ! -f ${RESULT_BASE}/check_kmemleak ]; then
> > +	if [ ! -f "$KMEMLEAK_CHECK_FILE" ]; then
> > +		return 0
> > +	fi
> > +
> > +	# Not enabled, so discard any report of leaks found.
> > +	if [ "$USE_KMEMLEAK" != "yes" ]; then
> > +		_capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> 
> New knob requires new documentation in README :)

Will do.  Happy New Year, by the way!

--D

> Thanks,
> Eryu
> 
> >  		return 0
> >  	fi
> >  
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-06 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-29 16:17 [PATCH 1/4] xfs/093: make sure the scratch directory still exists after repair Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs/138: format the scratch device before using it Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] common: fix kmemleak to work with sections Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03  9:10   ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 17:06     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-01-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: check for reasonable inode creation time Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-03  9:14   ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-06 16:41     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190206170654.GC29630@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).