From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 7512/8919] fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c:302:40: sparse: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:57:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218135714.GA24807@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190216195401.GY32253@magnolia>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:54:01AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 07:05:28AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 02:55:24PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > [rip all the cc off]
> > >
> >
> > cc linux-xfs
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 04:02:13AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > > > head: 7a92eb7cc1dc4c63e3a2fa9ab8e3c1049f199249
> > > > commit: b8f89801664f8413a88cf2c7539d1aeae07dd3c5 [7512/8919] xfs: distinguish between bnobt and cntbt magic values
> > > > reproduce:
> > > > # apt-get install sparse
> > > > git checkout b8f89801664f8413a88cf2c7539d1aeae07dd3c5
> > > > make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> > > > make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
> > > >
> > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > > >> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c:302:40: sparse: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
> > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c:302:40: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] dmagic
> > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c:302:40: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] bb_magic
> > >
> > > Hmmmm, I suspected this was going to happen, though when I built with
> > > those parameters the endian checking didn't trigger so I decided not to
> > > press any further. Oh well...
> > >
> >
> > Argh. Sorry, I wasn't aware this would result in noise.
>
> Heh. It turned out that I forgot that my computer was configured to use
> smatch instead of sparse, and only sparse does the endian checking.
> (Gee, I thought smatch was supposed to be a superset of sparse!)
>
> So with the addition of /even more/ wrapper scripts I can now run
> /both/.
>
> > > Can we get a fix going for this ASAP, please?
> > >
> >
> > FYI it probably won't be Monday until I can spin a proper patch. In the
> > meantime, what's the preferred solution?
> >
> > I thought we might be able to address the callers fairly cleanly by
> > creating a couple xfs_verify_magic[16|32]() wrappers and cast to the
> > underlying format, but then sparse just generates warnings for the
> > casts. So AFAICT, the options are to create separate wrappers and
> > xfs_buf_ops fields (magic16/magic32) for each magic type and use them
> > appropriately in each verifier or go back to how this patch was written
> > originally and use the in-core values.
>
> Hmm. It would be sort of ugly to have to re-add the endian conversions
> back into the verifier code now; I think I lean towards having a magic16
> array and a xfs_verify_magic16.
>
Ok.
> (Though I cheat and use anonymous unions :P)
>
I think that helps a bit.
> > The former seems silly to me. My preference is the latter. Thoughts or
> > other ideas? Is there some other way to safely cast a "restricted" type?
>
> None that I know of, sparse complains about any cast between restricted
> types. I shut up sparse with the following mostly untested patch:
>
> --D
>
> xfs: fix xfs_buf magic number endian checks
>
> Create a separate magic16 check function so that we don't run afoul of
> static checkers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
I was originally thinking of splitting out everyting into magic32/16,
but this shows that there aren't too many 16 instances. This looks good
and quiets everything for me as well:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 10 +++++-----
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 8 ++++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> index 0c92987f57fc..1f6e3965ff74 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> @@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_read_verify(
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_attr3_leaf_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_attr3_leaf",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_attr3_leaf_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_attr3_leaf_write_verify,
> .verify_struct = xfs_attr3_leaf_verify,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> index eb2cee428f26..e2737e2ac2ae 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ xfs_da3_blkinfo_verify(
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> struct xfs_da_blkinfo *hdr = &hdr3->hdr;
>
> - if (!xfs_verify_magic(bp, hdr->magic))
> + if (!xfs_verify_magic16(bp, hdr->magic))
> return __this_address;
>
> if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ xfs_da3_blkinfo_verify(
> return __this_address;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static xfs_failaddr_t
> @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ xfs_da3_node_verify_struct(
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_da3_node_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_da3_node",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA_NODE_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA3_NODE_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA_NODE_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA3_NODE_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_da3_node_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_da3_node_write_verify,
> .verify_struct = xfs_da3_node_verify_struct,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> index 094028b7b162..9a3767818c50 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> @@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify(
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dir3_leaf1_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_dir3_leaf1",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leaf_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify,
> .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify,
> @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dir3_leaf1_buf_ops = {
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dir3_leafn_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_dir3_leafn",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leaf_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify,
> .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
> index b956638a3532..fb5bd9a804f6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ xfs_dquot_buf_write_verify(
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dquot_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_dquot",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_dquot_buf_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_dquot_buf_write_verify,
> .verify_struct = xfs_dquot_buf_verify_struct,
> @@ -286,8 +286,8 @@ const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dquot_buf_ops = {
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dquot_buf_ra_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_dquot_ra",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DQUOT_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_dquot_buf_write_verify,
> };
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index f92f14e93ad3..e021d5133ccb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ xfs_inode_buf_verify(
>
> dip = xfs_buf_offset(bp, (i << mp->m_sb.sb_inodelog));
> unlinked_ino = be32_to_cpu(dip->di_next_unlinked);
> - di_ok = xfs_verify_magic(bp, dip->di_magic) &&
> + di_ok = xfs_verify_magic16(bp, dip->di_magic) &&
> xfs_dinode_good_version(mp, dip->di_version) &&
> xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, agno, unlinked_ino);
> if (unlikely(XFS_TEST_ERROR(!di_ok, mp,
> @@ -146,16 +146,16 @@ xfs_inode_buf_write_verify(
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_inode_buf_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_inode",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_inode_buf_read_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_inode_buf_write_verify,
> };
>
> const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_inode_buf_ra_ops = {
> .name = "xfs_inode_ra",
> - .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC),
> - cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC) },
> + .magic16 = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC),
> + cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC) },
> .verify_read = xfs_inode_buf_readahead_verify,
> .verify_write = xfs_inode_buf_write_verify,
> };
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 52a382b8cbce..548344e25128 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -2213,7 +2213,7 @@ void xfs_buf_set_ref(struct xfs_buf *bp, int lru_ref)
> bool
> xfs_verify_magic(
> struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - uint32_t dmagic)
> + __be32 dmagic)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> int idx;
> @@ -2223,3 +2223,21 @@ xfs_verify_magic(
> return false;
> return dmagic == bp->b_ops->magic[idx];
> }
> +/*
> + * Verify an on-disk magic value against the magic value specified in the
> + * verifier structure. The verifier magic is in disk byte order so the caller is
> + * expected to pass the value directly from disk.
> + */
> +bool
> +xfs_verify_magic16(
> + struct xfs_buf *bp,
> + __be16 dmagic)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> + int idx;
> +
> + idx = xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb);
> + if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!bp->b_ops || !bp->b_ops->magic16[idx])))
> + return false;
> + return dmagic == bp->b_ops->magic16[idx];
> +}
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> index 44f9423a1861..d0b96e071cec 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> @@ -125,7 +125,10 @@ struct xfs_buf_map {
>
> struct xfs_buf_ops {
> char *name;
> - uint32_t magic[2]; /* v4 and v5 on disk magic values */
> + union {
> + __be32 magic[2]; /* v4 and v5 on disk magic values */
> + __be16 magic16[2]; /* v4 and v5 on disk magic values */
> + };
> void (*verify_read)(struct xfs_buf *);
> void (*verify_write)(struct xfs_buf *);
> xfs_failaddr_t (*verify_struct)(struct xfs_buf *bp);
> @@ -387,6 +390,7 @@ extern int xfs_setsize_buftarg(xfs_buftarg_t *, unsigned int);
> #define xfs_readonly_buftarg(buftarg) bdev_read_only((buftarg)->bt_bdev)
>
> int xfs_buf_reverify(struct xfs_buf *bp, const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops);
> -bool xfs_verify_magic(struct xfs_buf *bp, uint32_t dmagic);
> +bool xfs_verify_magic(struct xfs_buf *bp, __be32 dmagic);
> +bool xfs_verify_magic16(struct xfs_buf *bp, __be16 dmagic);
>
> #endif /* __XFS_BUF_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index f5948d16015b..3371d1ff27c4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -3049,7 +3049,7 @@ xlog_recover_inode_pass2(
> * Make sure the place we're flushing out to really looks
> * like an inode!
> */
> - if (unlikely(!xfs_verify_magic(bp, dip->di_magic))) {
> + if (unlikely(!xfs_verify_magic16(bp, dip->di_magic))) {
> xfs_alert(mp,
> "%s: Bad inode magic number, dip = "PTR_FMT", dino bp = "PTR_FMT", ino = %Ld",
> __func__, dip, bp, in_f->ilf_ino);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201902160410.WC4AmuSu%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20190215225524.GE6503@magnolia>
2019-02-16 12:05 ` [linux-next:master 7512/8919] fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c:302:40: sparse: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) Brian Foster
2019-02-16 19:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 13:57 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-02-18 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218135714.GA24807@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox