public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: introduce an always_cow mode
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:31:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221173108.GS32253@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220150818.GA27934@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:08:18PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:31:14AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > >  - xfs/326 fails to modify the file at all in always_cow mode after
> > >    injecting the refcount error, leading to an unexpected md5sum
> > >    after the remount, but that again is expected
> > 
> > I'm assuming the purpose of the debug knob is so that we can get all the
> > fstests regressions fixed before enabling always cow modes for users...
> 
> Theoriginal  purpose is to allow exercising the always COW functionality,
> so that  it can be tested without SMR support or atomic write which are
> still in flux.
> 
> While developing it I also noticed that it also helps to uncover general
> COW functionality bugs, so it also is a pretty good debug aid for that.
> 
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * If always_cow mode we can't use preallocations and
> > > +			 * thus should not create them.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip)) {
> > > +				error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +				goto out_unlock;
> > > +			}
> > > +
> > 
> > Ok, so the basic premise here is that we never call xfs_alloc_file_space
> > for alwayscow inodes.  As I pointed out in my reply that focused on
> > fstests errors, xfs_file_fallocate is not the only caller of
> > xfs_alloc_file_space, so I think xfs_ioc_space and friends are going to
> > need a similar treatment.
> 
> As mentioned the XFS_IOC_RESVSP / XFS_IOC_RESVSP64 cases in
> xfs_ioc_space are dead code.  the allocspc/freespc ones aren't, and
> while those aren't super useful on always_cow inodes they do work
> just fine.
> 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > > index 7b71dcc97ef0..72533e9dddc6 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > > @@ -395,12 +395,13 @@ xfs_quota_calc_throttle(
> > >  STATIC xfs_fsblock_t
> > >  xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
> > >  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> > > +	int			whichfork,
> > >  	loff_t			offset,
> > >  	loff_t			count,
> > >  	struct xfs_iext_cursor	*icur)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
> > > -	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> > > +	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
> > 
> > Hmm, so are we able to do preallocations in the cow fork now?
> > 
> > I think that's a separate change from adding the alwayscow knob.
> 
> I can split a prep patch out, but by always writing through the COW fork
> in always_cow mode we also want the speculative EOF preallocations there.
> Without always_cow we don't COW at EOF per defintion so it is rather
> pointless.
> 
> > > +static inline bool xfs_is_always_cow_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ip->i_mount->m_always_cow &&
> > > +		xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&ip->i_mount->m_sb);
> > 
> > Assuming the next step is to rewrite this function to autodetect a
> > device that cannot easily handle rewrites (aka SMR)...
> 
> For SMR we'll have a per-sb flag, for atomic writes a per-inode one.
> But right now I intended these to exist in addition, not instead of the
> debug know.
> 
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysctl.h
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysctl.h
> > > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct xfs_globals {
> > >  	int	log_recovery_delay;	/* log recovery delay (secs) */
> > >  	int	mount_delay;		/* mount setup delay (secs) */
> > >  	bool	bug_on_assert;		/* BUG() the kernel on assert failure */
> > > +	bool	always_cow;		/* use COW fork for all overwrites */
> > 
> > ...I'm also wondering if it makes sense to separate the creation of the
> > sysctl knob into a separate patch so that we can cleanly revert just
> > this part whenever we land a more permanent interface for enabling
> > alwayscow paths?
> 
> I could split it - but my intention was to keep the debug know around
> in the long term, as it is really helpful for exercising the COW code.

/me decides he'll put this one in since it's a debug knob...

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-18  9:18 COW improvements and always_cow support V5 Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: make xfs_bmbt_to_iomap more useful Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: fix SEEK_DATA for speculative COW fork preallocation Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19  5:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: don't use delalloc extents for COW on files with extsize hints Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19  5:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-21 17:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-21 22:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-22 14:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: also truncate holes covered by COW blocks Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: merge COW handling into xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-21 17:59   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-21 21:30     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-22 12:31       ` Brian Foster
2019-02-22 14:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-22 14:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-22 15:20       ` Brian Foster
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make COW fork unwritten extent conversions more robust Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: report IOMAP_F_SHARED from xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19  5:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18  9:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: introduce an always_cow mode Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19  5:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-19 17:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-20 14:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-20 15:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-20 15:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-21 17:31       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-02-18  9:19 ` xfs/420 and xfs/421: don't disturb unwritten status with md5sum Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-09 10:32   ` Eryu Guan
2019-03-09 17:34     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190221173108.GS32253@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox