From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfs/420 and xfs/421: don't disturb unwritten status with md5sum
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 18:32:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190309103211.GP2824@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218091951.GA5171@lst.de>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:19:51AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The way we decided if an unwritten extent is considered a hole or data
> is by checking if the page and/or blocks are marked uptodate, that is
> contain valid data in the page cache.
>
> xfs/420 and xfs/421 try to exercise SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA in the
> presence of cowextsize preallocations over holes in the data fork. The
> current XFS code never actually uses those for buffer writes, but a
> pending patch changes that. For SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA to work properly
> in that case we also need to look at the COW fork in their
> implementations and thus have to rely on the unwritten extent page cache
> probing. But the tests for it ensure we do have valid data in the
> pagecache by calling md5sum on the test files, and thus reading their
> contents (including the zero-filled holes) in, and thus making them
> all valid data.
>
> Fix that by dropping the page cache content after the md5sum calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Hi Darrick, would you please help review this version of the fix as
well? I basically have no idea about the implementation of the "pending
patch" and what it changes.. Thanks a lot!
Eryu
> ---
> tests/xfs/420 | 6 ++++++
> tests/xfs/421 | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/420 b/tests/xfs/420
> index a083a12b..34199637 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/420
> +++ b/tests/xfs/420
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "CoW the shared part then write into the empty part" | tee -a $seqres.full
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
> @@ -106,6 +108,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "sync filesystem" | tee -a $seqres.full
> sync
> @@ -123,6 +127,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "Remount" | tee -a $seqres.full
> _scratch_cycle_mount
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/421 b/tests/xfs/421
> index a2734aba..374389bd 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/421
> +++ b/tests/xfs/421
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "CoW the shared part then write into the empty part" | tee -a $seqres.full
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
> @@ -106,6 +108,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "sync filesystem" | tee -a $seqres.full
> sync
> @@ -123,6 +127,8 @@ echo "Compare files"
> md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch
> md5sum $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> +# drop caches to make sure the page cache for the unwritten extents is clean
> +echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> echo "Remount" | tee -a $seqres.full
> _scratch_cycle_mount
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-09 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-18 9:18 COW improvements and always_cow support V5 Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: make xfs_bmbt_to_iomap more useful Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: fix SEEK_DATA for speculative COW fork preallocation Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 5:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: don't use delalloc extents for COW on files with extsize hints Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 5:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-21 17:58 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-21 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-22 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: also truncate holes covered by COW blocks Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: merge COW handling into xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-21 17:59 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-21 21:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-22 12:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-22 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-22 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-22 15:20 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make COW fork unwritten extent conversions more robust Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: report IOMAP_F_SHARED from xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 5:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: introduce an always_cow mode Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 5:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-19 17:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-20 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-20 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-19 18:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-20 15:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-21 17:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 9:19 ` xfs/420 and xfs/421: don't disturb unwritten status with md5sum Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-09 10:32 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2019-03-09 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190309103211.GP2824@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).