public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't trip over uninitialized buffer on extent read of corrupted inode
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:03:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315230359.GK4929@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315143903.6567-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:39:03AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> We've had rather rare reports of bmap btree block corruption where
> the bmap root block has a level count of zero. The root cause of the
> corruption is so far unknown. We do have verifier checks to detect
> this form of on-disk corruption, but this doesn't cover a memory
> corruption variant of the problem. The latter is a reasonable
> possibility because the root block is part of the inode fork and can
> reside in-core for some time before inode extents are read.
> 
> If this occurs, it leads to a system crash such as the following:
> 
>  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffff00000221
>  PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
>  ...
>  RIP: 0010:xfs_trans_brelse+0xf/0x200 [xfs]
>  ...
>  Call Trace:
>   xfs_iread_extents+0x379/0x540 [xfs]
>   xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay+0x11a/0xb40 [xfs]
>   ? xfs_attr_get+0xd1/0x120 [xfs]
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   xfs_file_iomap_begin+0x4c4/0x6d0 [xfs]
>   ? __vfs_getxattr+0x53/0x70
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   iomap_apply+0x63/0x130
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   iomap_file_buffered_write+0x62/0x90
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0xe4/0x3b0 [xfs]
>   __vfs_write+0x150/0x1b0
>   vfs_write+0xba/0x1c0
>   ksys_pwrite64+0x64/0xa0
>   do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1d0
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> The crash occurs because xfs_iread_extents() attempts to release an
> uninitialized buffer pointer as the level == 0 value prevented the
> buffer from ever being allocated or read. Change the level > 0
> assert to an explicit error check in xfs_iread_extents() to avoid
> crashing the kernel in the event of localized, in-core inode
> corruption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>From a static analysis standpoint this looks fine, but it feels a little
weird not to know what the root cause is.  I scanned around briefly but
nothing obvious stood out.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 48502cb9990f..ae4c3b0d84db 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,10 @@ xfs_iread_extents(
>  	 * Root level must use BMAP_BROOT_PTR_ADDR macro to get ptr out.
>  	 */
>  	level = be16_to_cpu(block->bb_level);
> -	ASSERT(level > 0);
> +	if (unlikely(level == 0)) {
> +		XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
> +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +	}
>  	pp = XFS_BMAP_BROOT_PTR_ADDR(mp, block, 1, ifp->if_broot_bytes);
>  	bno = be64_to_cpu(*pp);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-15 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-15 14:39 [PATCH] xfs: don't trip over uninitialized buffer on extent read of corrupted inode Brian Foster
2019-03-15 23:03 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-03-16 11:48   ` Brian Foster
     [not found] <20190718230617.7439-1-mcgrof>
2019-07-19 19:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-07-19 21:23   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-07-22 14:35     ` Sasha Levin
2019-07-19 23:07   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-07-21 21:42     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190315230359.GK4929@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox