From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfs: add a new ioctl to describe allocation group geometry
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:35:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402213528.GG5147@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402173446.GI2899@bfoster>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:34:46PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:10:40AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Add a new ioctl to describe an allocation group's geometry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
>
> Just a couple nits...
>
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 2 ++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> > index 1ef8acf35e7d..1679e37fe28d 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include "xfs_ialloc.h"
> > #include "xfs_rmap.h"
> > #include "xfs_ag.h"
> > +#include "xfs_ag_resv.h"
> >
> > static struct xfs_buf *
> > xfs_get_aghdr_buf(
> > @@ -461,3 +462,50 @@ xfs_ag_extend_space(
> > len, &XFS_RMAP_OINFO_SKIP_UPDATE,
> > XFS_AG_RESV_NONE);
> > }
> > +
> > +/* Retrieve AG geometry. */
> > +int
> > +xfs_ag_get_geometry(
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > + xfs_agnumber_t agno,
> > + struct xfs_ag_geometry *ageo)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> > + struct xfs_agi *agi;
> > + struct xfs_agf *agf;
> > + struct xfs_perag *pag;
> > + unsigned int freeblks;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + memset(ageo, 0, sizeof(*ageo));
> > +
> > + if (agno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agcount)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> I'd probably error check prior to the memset().
Ok.
> > + error = xfs_ialloc_read_agi(mp, NULL, agno, &bp);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(bp);
> > + ageo->ag_icount = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_count);
> > + ageo->ag_ifree = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_freecount);
> > + xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> > +
> > + error = xfs_alloc_read_agf(mp, NULL, agno, 0, &bp);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + agf = XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(bp);
> > + pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, agno);
> > + ageo->ag_length = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length);
> > + freeblks = pag->pagf_freeblks +
> > + pag->pagf_flcount +
> > + pag->pagf_btreeblks -
> > + xfs_ag_resv_needed(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_NONE);
> > + ageo->ag_freeblks = freeblks;
> > + xfs_perag_put(pag);
> > + xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> > +
>
> I wonder if we should lock down the agi and agf together to prevent any
> potential incoherent reporting between them..? For example, suppose we
> collect the agi values, release the agi and lose a race to the agf by an
> inode allocator who consumes more free blocks before we ultimately read
> the agf values and return.
Good point, will fix.
--D
> Brian
>
> > + ageo->ag_number = agno;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h
> > index 412702e23f61..5166322807e7 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h
> > @@ -26,5 +26,7 @@ struct aghdr_init_data {
> > int xfs_ag_init_headers(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct aghdr_init_data *id);
> > int xfs_ag_extend_space(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > struct aghdr_init_data *id, xfs_extlen_t len);
> > +int xfs_ag_get_geometry(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno,
> > + struct xfs_ag_geometry *ageo);
> >
> > #endif /* __LIBXFS_AG_H */
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > index 1dba751cde60..87226e00e7bd 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > @@ -266,6 +266,19 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
> > #define XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(s) ((xfs_rfsblock_t)((s)->sb_agcount - 1) * \
> > (s)->sb_agblocks + XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Output for XFS_IOC_AG_GEOMETRY
> > + */
> > +struct xfs_ag_geometry {
> > + __u32 ag_number; /* i/o: AG number */
> > + __u32 ag_length; /* o: length in blocks */
> > + __u32 ag_freeblks; /* o: free space */
> > + __u32 ag_icount; /* o: inodes allocated */
> > + __u32 ag_ifree; /* o: inodes free */
> > + __u32 ag_reserved32; /* o: zero */
> > + __u64 ag_reserved[5]; /* o: zero */
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > * Structures for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA, XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSLOG & XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRT
> > */
> > @@ -619,6 +632,7 @@ struct xfs_scrub_metadata {
> > #define XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS _IOR ('X', 58, struct xfs_fs_eofblocks)
> > /* XFS_IOC_GETFSMAP ------ hoisted 59 */
> > #define XFS_IOC_SCRUB_METADATA _IOWR('X', 60, struct xfs_scrub_metadata)
> > +#define XFS_IOC_AG_GEOMETRY _IOWR('X', 61, struct xfs_ag_geometry)
> >
> > /*
> > * ioctl commands that replace IRIX syssgi()'s
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index 7fd8815633dc..b5918ce656bd 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> > #include "xfs_fsmap.h"
> > #include "scrub/xfs_scrub.h"
> > #include "xfs_sb.h"
> > +#include "xfs_ag.h"
> >
> > #include <linux/capability.h>
> > #include <linux/cred.h>
> > @@ -834,6 +835,26 @@ xfs_ioc_fsgeometry(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_ioc_ag_geometry(
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > + void __user *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_ag_geometry ageo;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&ageo, arg, sizeof(ageo)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + error = xfs_ag_get_geometry(mp, ageo.ag_number, &ageo);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + if (copy_to_user(arg, &ageo, sizeof(ageo)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Linux extended inode flags interface.
> > */
> > @@ -1960,6 +1981,9 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> > case XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY:
> > return xfs_ioc_fsgeometry(mp, arg);
> >
> > + case XFS_IOC_AG_GEOMETRY:
> > + return xfs_ioc_ag_geometry(mp, arg);
> > +
> > case XFS_IOC_GETVERSION:
> > return put_user(inode->i_generation, (int __user *)arg);
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > index 323cfd4b15dc..28d2110dd871 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> > @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
> > case XFS_IOC_DIOINFO:
> > case XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V2:
> > case XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY:
> > + case XFS_IOC_AG_GEOMETRY:
> > case XFS_IOC_FSGETXATTR:
> > case XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR:
> > case XFS_IOC_FSGETXATTRA:
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-01 17:10 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: online health tracking support Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: track metadata health levels Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 13:22 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 13:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: replace the BAD_SUMMARY mount flag with the equivalent health code Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 13:22 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: clear BAD_SUMMARY if unmounting an unhealthy filesystem Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 13:24 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 13:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 13:53 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 18:32 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: expand xfs_fsop_geom Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 17:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 21:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-02 22:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: add a new ioctl to describe allocation group geometry Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 17:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 21:35 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: report fs and rt health via geometry structure Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 17:35 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-02 18:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-02 23:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: report AG health via AG geometry ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-03 14:30 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-03 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-04 11:48 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-05 20:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-08 11:34 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-09 3:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: report inode health via bulkstat Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: scrub/repair should update filesystem metadata health Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-04 11:50 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-04 18:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-05 13:07 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-05 20:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-08 11:35 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-09 3:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-01 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: update health status if we get a clean bill of health Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-04 11:51 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-04 15:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402213528.GG5147@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox