From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: merge adjacent io completions of the same type
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:49:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415144947.GC4222@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155529408121.243484.4204906013564330851.stgit@magnolia>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 07:08:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> It's possible for pagecache writeback to split up a large amount of work
> into smaller pieces for throttling purposes or to reduce the amount of
> time a writeback operation is pending. Whatever the reason, XFS can end
> up with a bunch of IO completions that call for the same operation to be
> performed on a contiguous extent mapping. Since mappings are extent
> based in XFS, we'd prefer to run fewer transactions when we can.
>
> When we're processing an ioend on the list of io completions, check to
> see if the next items on the list are both adjacent and of the same
> type. If so, we can merge the completions to reduce transaction
> overhead.
>
> On fast storage this doesn't seem to make much of a difference in
> performance, though the number of transactions for an overnight xfstests
> run seems to drop by ~5%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index f7a9bb661826..53afa2e6e3e7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ STATIC void
> xfs_end_ioend(
> struct xfs_ioend *ioend)
> {
> + struct list_head ioend_list;
> struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(ioend->io_inode);
> xfs_off_t offset = ioend->io_offset;
> size_t size = ioend->io_size;
> @@ -273,7 +274,89 @@ xfs_end_ioend(
> done:
> if (ioend->io_append_trans)
> error = xfs_setfilesize_ioend(ioend, error);
> + list_replace_init(&ioend->io_list, &ioend_list);
> xfs_destroy_ioend(ioend, error);
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&ioend_list)) {
> + ioend = list_first_entry(&ioend_list, struct xfs_ioend,
> + io_list);
> + list_del_init(&ioend->io_list);
> + xfs_destroy_ioend(ioend, error);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We can merge two adjacent ioends if they have the same set of work to do.
> + */
> +static bool
> +xfs_ioend_can_merge(
> + struct xfs_ioend *ioend,
> + int ioend_error,
> + struct xfs_ioend *next)
> +{
> + int next_error;
> +
> + next_error = blk_status_to_errno(next->io_bio->bi_status);
> + if (ioend_error != next_error)
> + return false;
> + if ((ioend->io_fork == XFS_COW_FORK) ^ (next->io_fork == XFS_COW_FORK))
> + return false;
> + if ((ioend->io_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN) ^
> + (next->io_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN))
> + return false;
> + if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size != next->io_offset)
> + return false;
> + if (xfs_ioend_is_append(ioend) != xfs_ioend_is_append(next))
> + return false;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Try to merge adjacent completions. */
> +STATIC void
> +xfs_ioend_try_merge(
> + struct xfs_ioend *ioend,
> + struct list_head *more_ioends)
> +{
> + struct xfs_ioend *next_ioend;
> + int ioend_error;
> + int error;
> +
> + if (list_empty(more_ioends))
> + return;
> +
> + ioend_error = blk_status_to_errno(ioend->io_bio->bi_status);
> +
> + while (!list_empty(more_ioends)) {
> + next_ioend = list_first_entry(more_ioends, struct xfs_ioend,
> + io_list);
> + if (!xfs_ioend_can_merge(ioend, ioend_error, next_ioend))
> + break;
> + list_move_tail(&next_ioend->io_list, &ioend->io_list);
> + ioend->io_size += next_ioend->io_size;
> + if (ioend->io_append_trans) {
> + error = xfs_setfilesize_ioend(next_ioend, 1);
> + ASSERT(error == 1);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* list_sort compare function for ioends */
> +static int
> +xfs_ioend_compare(
> + void *priv,
> + struct list_head *a,
> + struct list_head *b)
> +{
> + struct xfs_ioend *ia;
> + struct xfs_ioend *ib;
> +
> + ia = container_of(a, struct xfs_ioend, io_list);
> + ib = container_of(b, struct xfs_ioend, io_list);
> + if (ia->io_offset < ib->io_offset)
> + return -1;
> + else if (ia->io_offset > ib->io_offset)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Finish all pending io completions. */
> @@ -292,10 +375,13 @@ xfs_end_io(
> list_replace_init(&ip->i_iodone_list, &completion_list);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ip->i_iodone_lock, flags);
>
> + list_sort(NULL, &completion_list, xfs_ioend_compare);
> +
> while (!list_empty(&completion_list)) {
> ioend = list_first_entry(&completion_list, struct xfs_ioend,
> io_list);
> list_del_init(&ioend->io_list);
> + xfs_ioend_try_merge(ioend, &completion_list);
> xfs_end_ioend(ioend);
> }
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 2:07 [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: merged io completions Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 2:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: implement per-inode writeback completion queues Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 14:49 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-15 15:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 16:13 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-15 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 17:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-15 18:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 18:13 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-15 19:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 18:13 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-23 6:34 ` [PATCH " Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-23 15:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 2:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: remove unused m_data_workqueue Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 14:49 ` Brian Foster
2019-04-15 2:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: merge adjacent io completions of the same type Darrick J. Wong
2019-04-15 14:49 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190415144947.GC4222@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox