public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/3] libxfs: factor common xfs_trans_bjoin code
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:12:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520231227.GK5335@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467b059a-e99c-a2dc-5c63-606212e5505f@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:58:29PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/20/19 5:56 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:39:49PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Most of xfs_trans_bjoin is duplicated in xfs_trans_get_buf_map,
> >> xfs_trans_getsb and xfs_trans_read_buf_map.  Add a new
> >> _xfs_trans_bjoin which can be called by all three functions.
> >>
> >> Source kernel commit: d7e84f413726876c0ec66bbf90770f69841f7663
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  libxfs/trans.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libxfs/trans.c b/libxfs/trans.c
> >> index f3c28fa7..f78222fd 100644
> >> --- a/libxfs/trans.c
> >> +++ b/libxfs/trans.c
> >> @@ -537,19 +537,50 @@ xfs_trans_binval(
> >>  	tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DIRTY;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -void
> >> -xfs_trans_bjoin(
> >> -	xfs_trans_t		*tp,
> >> -	xfs_buf_t		*bp)
> >> +/*
> >> + * Add the locked buffer to the transaction.
> >> + *
> >> + * The buffer must be locked, and it cannot be associated with any
> >> + * transaction.
> >> + *
> >> + * If the buffer does not yet have a buf log item associated with it,
> >> + * then allocate one for it.  Then add the buf item to the transaction.
> >> + */
> >> +STATIC void
> >> +_xfs_trans_bjoin(
> >> +	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
> >> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp,
> >> +	int			reset_recur)
> > 
> > bool?
> 
> If you fix it in the kernel I'll merge it to xfsprogs ;)

LOL, ok.

--D

> >>  {
> >> -	xfs_buf_log_item_t	*bip;
> >> +	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip;
> >>  
> >>  	ASSERT(bp->b_transp == NULL);
> >>  
> >> +        /*
> >> +	 * The xfs_buf_log_item pointer is stored in b_log_item.  If
> >> +	 * it doesn't have one yet, then allocate one and initialize it.
> >> +	 * The checks to see if one is there are in xfs_buf_item_init().
> >> +	 */
> >>  	xfs_buf_item_init(bp, tp->t_mountp);
> >>  	bip = bp->b_log_item;
> >> +	if (reset_recur)
> >> +		bip->bli_recur = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Attach the item to the transaction so we can find it in
> >> +	 * xfs_trans_get_buf() and friends.
> >> +	 */
> >>  	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, (xfs_log_item_t *)bip);
> > 
> > Kill typedef here               ^^^^^^?
> 
> ditto.
> 
> Point of all this is to match the kernel for easier future syncups.
> 
> (oh wait, actually, this is fixed in a later patch, getting rid of the dumb
> cast altogether)
> 
> -Eric
> 
> > --D
> > 
> >>  	bp->b_transp = tp;
> >> +
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +void
> >> +xfs_trans_bjoin(
> >> +	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
> >> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp)
> >> +{
> >> +	_xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp, 0);
> >>  	trace_xfs_trans_bjoin(bp->b_log_item);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -594,9 +625,7 @@ xfs_trans_get_buf_map(
> >>  	if (bp == NULL)
> >>  		return NULL;
> >>  
> >> -	xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp);
> >> -	bip = bp->b_log_item;
> >> -	bip->bli_recur = 0;
> >> +	_xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp, 1);
> >>  	trace_xfs_trans_get_buf(bp->b_log_item);
> >>  	return bp;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -626,9 +655,7 @@ xfs_trans_getsb(
> >>  
> >>  	bp = xfs_getsb(mp);
> >>  
> >> -	xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp);
> >> -	bip = bp->b_log_item;
> >> -	bip->bli_recur = 0;
> >> +	_xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp, 1);
> >>  	trace_xfs_trans_getsb(bp->b_log_item);
> >>  	return bp;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -677,9 +704,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map(
> >>  	if (bp->b_error)
> >>  		goto out_relse;
> >>  
> >> -	xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp);
> >> -	bip = bp->b_log_item;
> >> -	bip->bli_recur = 0;
> >> +	_xfs_trans_bjoin(tp, bp, 1);
> >>  done:
> >>  	trace_xfs_trans_read_buf(bp->b_log_item);
> >>  	*bpp = bp;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.17.0
> >>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16 17:42 [PATCH 0/3] xfsprogs: more libxfs/ spring cleaning Eric Sandeen
2019-05-16 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] libxfs: rename shared kernel functions from libxfs_ to xfs_ Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 20:49   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-17 21:00     ` Eric Sandeen
2019-05-16 17:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] libxfs: remove libxfs API #defines for unexported xfs functions Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 21:06   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfsprogs: remove unused flags arg from getsb interfaces Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 21:09   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-16 20:38 ` [PATCH 4/3] libxfs: Remove XACT_DEBUG #ifdefs Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 21:36   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-20 22:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-16 20:39 ` [PATCH 5/3] libxfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 22:29   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-17 23:01     ` Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 23:41       ` Allison Collins
2019-05-16 20:39 ` [PATCH 6/3] libxfs: factor common xfs_trans_bjoin code Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 22:56   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-20 22:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-20 22:58     ` Eric Sandeen
2019-05-20 23:12       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-05-16 20:40 ` [PATCH 7/3] libxfs: fix argument to xfs_trans_add_item Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 22:57   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-16 20:41 ` [PATCH 8/3] xfs: factor log item initialisation Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 23:50   ` Allison Collins
2019-05-17 19:46 ` [PATCH 9/3] libxfs: create current_time helper and sync xfs_trans_ichgtime Eric Sandeen
2019-05-17 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/3] libxfs: share kernel's xfs_trans_inode.c Eric Sandeen
2019-05-20 23:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-20 23:03 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfsprogs: more libxfs/ spring cleaning Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-20 23:10   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520231227.GK5335@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox