From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: fix inode_cluster_size rounding mayhem
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:08:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604010848.GB1200785@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604002507.GK29573@dread.disaster.area>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 10:25:07AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:51:25PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > inode_cluster_size is supposed to represent the size (in bytes) of an
> > inode cluster buffer. We avoid having to handle multiple clusters per
> > filesystem block on filesystems with large blocks by openly rounding
> > this value up to 1 FSB when necessary. However, we never reset
> > inode_cluster_size to reflect this new rounded value, which adds to the
> > potential for mistakes in calculating geometries.
> >
> > Fix this by setting inode_cluster_size to reflect the rounded-up size if
> > needed, and special-case the few places in the sparse inodes code where
> > we actually need the smaller value to validate on-disk metadata.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Looks good - really helps simplify what some of the code does.
>
> A few minor things below.
>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h | 8 ++++++--
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 6 ++----
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 3 +--
> > fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 4 ++--
> > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > index 0e831f04725c..1d3e1e66baf5 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > @@ -1698,11 +1698,15 @@ struct xfs_ino_geometry {
> > /* Maximum inode count in this filesystem. */
> > uint64_t maxicount;
> >
> > + /* Actual inode cluster buffer size, in bytes. */
> > + unsigned int inode_cluster_size;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Desired inode cluster buffer size, in bytes. This value is not
> > - * rounded up to at least one filesystem block.
> > + * rounded up to at least one filesystem block, which is necessary for
> > + * validating sb_spino_align.
> > */
> > - unsigned int inode_cluster_size;
> > + unsigned int inode_cluster_size_raw;
>
> Can you mention in the comment that this should never be used
> outside of validating sb_spino_align and that inode_cluster_size is
> the value that should be used by all runtime code?
Ok.
> > /* Inode cluster sizes, adjusted to be at least 1 fsb. */
> > unsigned int inodes_per_cluster;
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > index cff202d0ee4a..976860673b6c 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > @@ -2810,6 +2810,16 @@ xfs_ialloc_setup_geometry(
> > igeo->maxicount = 0;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Compute the desired size of an inode cluster buffer size, which
> > + * starts at 8K and (on v5 filesystems) scales up with larger inode
> > + * sizes.
> > + *
> > + * Preserve the desired inode cluster size because the sparse inodes
> > + * feature uses that desired size (not the actual size) to compute the
> > + * sparse inode alignment. The mount code validates this value, so we
> > + * cannot change the behavior.
> > + */
> > igeo->inode_cluster_size = XFS_INODE_BIG_CLUSTER_SIZE;
> > if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > int new_size = igeo->inode_cluster_size;
> > @@ -2818,12 +2828,21 @@ xfs_ialloc_setup_geometry(
> > if (mp->m_sb.sb_inoalignmt >= XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, new_size))
> > igeo->inode_cluster_size = new_size;
> > }
> > + igeo->inode_cluster_size_raw = igeo->inode_cluster_size;
>
> I think I'd prefer to see the calculation use
> igeo->inode_cluster_size_raw, and then that gets used to calculate
> igeo->blocks_per_cluster, then igeo->inode_cluster_size is
> calculated from blocks_per_cluster like you've done below. That way
> there is an obvious logic flow to the variable derivation. i.e.
> "this is how we calculate the raw cluster size and this is how we
> calculate the actual runtime cluster size"...
Makes sense.
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Compute the inode cluster buffer size ratios. We avoid needing to
> > + * handle multiple clusters per filesystem block by rounding up
> > + * blocks_per_cluster to 1 if necessary. Set the inode cluster size
> > + * to the actual value.
> > + */
> > igeo->blocks_per_cluster = xfs_icluster_size_fsb(mp);
> > igeo->inodes_per_cluster = XFS_FSB_TO_INO(mp,
> > igeo->blocks_per_cluster);
> > igeo->cluster_align = xfs_ialloc_cluster_alignment(mp);
> > igeo->cluster_align_inodes = XFS_FSB_TO_INO(mp,
> > igeo->cluster_align);
> > + igeo->inode_cluster_size = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, igeo->blocks_per_cluster);
>
> I'd put this immediately after we calculate blocks_per_cluster...
Ok. Weirdly I just did this to fix up merge conflicts in the patch
stack before I even saw this comment....
--D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 22:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] xfs: refactor inode geometry Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-03 22:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: separate " Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-04 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2019-06-03 22:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: refactor inode geometry setup routines Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-04 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-06-04 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-03 22:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: hide inode geometry calculation helpers Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-03 22:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: fix inode_cluster_size rounding mayhem Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-04 0:25 ` Dave Chinner
2019-06-04 1:08 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-06-03 22:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: finish converting to inodes_per_cluster Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-04 0:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604010848.GB1200785@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox