From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:58516 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729172AbfFGTaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:30:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 13:30:21 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: xfs: Fix typo Message-ID: <20190607133021.3a537e3a@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia> References: <20190509030549.2253-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190607114415.32cb32dd@lwn.net> <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Shiyang Ruan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:34:10 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > I doubt the value of maintaining duplicate copies of this document in > the kernel and the xfs documentation repo, and since the xfs docs and > kernel licences aren't compatible maybe we should withdraw one... Um .... the in-kernel docs say nothing about an incompatible license. I see only a GPL license at the repo you pointed to as well. Is there something I don't know going on here? If the licenses aren't compatible then those files shouldn't be there. Thanks, jon