From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: remove more ondisk directory corruption asserts
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:49:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190705144904.GC37448@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156158199994.495944.4584531696054696463.stgit@magnolia>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:46:40PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Continue our game of replacing ASSERTs for corrupt ondisk metadata with
> EFSCORRUPTED returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>
...
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> index 16731d2d684b..f7f3fb458019 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> @@ -743,7 +743,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_for_entry(
> ents = dp->d_ops->leaf_ents_p(leaf);
>
> xfs_dir3_leaf_check(dp, bp);
> - ASSERT(leafhdr.count > 0);
> + if (leafhdr.count <= 0)
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
This error return bubbles up to xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_int() and
xfs_da3_node_lookup_int(). The latter has a direct return value as well
as a *result return parameter, which unconditionally carries the return
value from xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_int(). xfs_da3_node_lookup_int() has
multiple callers, but a quick look at one (xfs_attr_node_addname())
suggests we might not handle corruption errors properly via the *result
parameter. Perhaps we also need to fix up xfs_da3_node_lookup_int() to
return particular errors directly?
Brian
>
> /*
> * Look up the hash value in the leaf entries.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-05 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 20:46 [PATCH v2 0/6] xfs: scrub-related fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: remove more ondisk directory corruption asserts Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:49 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-07-05 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 17:27 ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: attribute scrub should use seen_enough to pass error values Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:49 ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: refactor extended attribute buffer pointer functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52 ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: refactor attr scrub memory allocation function Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52 ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: only allocate memory for scrubbing attributes when we need it Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52 ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: online scrub needn't bother zeroing its temporary buffer Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52 ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 17:26 ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 17:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190705144904.GC37448@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).