From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Murphy Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: xfs quota test xfs/050 fails with dax mount option and "-d su=2m,sw=1" mkfs option
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:13:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729001308.GX7689@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724094317.4yjm4smk2z47cwmv@XZHOUW.usersys.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:43:17PM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As subject.
>
> -d su=2m,sw=1 && -o dax fail
> -d su=2m,sw=1 && NO dax pass
> no su mkfs option && -o dax pass
> no su mkfs option && NO dax pass
>
> On latest Linus tree. Reproduce every time.
>
> Testing on older kernels are going on to see if it's a regression.
>
> Is this failure expected ?
I'm not sure it's actually a failure at all. DAX does not do delayed
allocation, so if the write is aligned to sunit and at EOF it will
round the allocation up to a full stripe unit. IOWs, for this test
once the file size gets beyond sunit on DAX, writes will allocate in
sunit chunks.
And, well, xfs/050 has checks in it for extent size hints, and
notruns if:
[ $extsize -ge 512000 ] && \
_notrun "Extent size hint is too large ($extsize bytes)"
Because EDQUOT occurs when:
> + URK 99: 2097152 is out of range! [3481600,4096000]
the file has less than 3.5MB or > 4MB allocated to it, and for a
stripe unit of > 512k, EDQUOT will occur at <3.5MB. That's what
we are seeing here - a 2MB allocation at offset 2MB is > 4096000
bytes, and so it gets EDQUOT at that point....
IOWs, this looks like a test problem, not a code failure...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-24 9:43 xfs quota test xfs/050 fails with dax mount option and "-d su=2m,sw=1" mkfs option Murphy Zhou
2019-07-29 0:13 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-07-29 8:28 ` Murphy Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190729001308.GX7689@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jencce.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox