From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40460 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbfHAGIC (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 02:08:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:07:55 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() Message-ID: <20190801060755.GA14893@lst.de> References: <20190730205705.9018-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20190730205705.9018-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730205705.9018-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: john.hubbard@gmail.com Cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Christian Benvenuti , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , "Darrick J . Wong" , Dave Chinner , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Jerome Glisse , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , Mike Marciniszyn , Mike Rapoport , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML , John Hubbard , Christoph Hellwig On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:57:03PM -0700, john.hubbard@gmail.com wrote: > @@ -40,10 +40,7 @@ > static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages, > int dirty) > { > - if (dirty) > - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages); > - else > - put_user_pages(p, num_pages); > + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, dirty); > } __qib_release_user_pages should be removed now as a direct call to put_user_pages_dirty_lock is a lot more clear. > index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c > @@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head *chunk_list, int dirty) > for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) { > page = sg_page(sg); > pa = sg_phys(sg); > - if (dirty) > - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1); > - else > - put_user_page(page); > + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty); > usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa); There is a pre-existing bug here, as this needs to use the sg_page iterator. Probably worth throwing in a fix into your series while you are at it. > @@ -63,15 +63,7 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, int stag_index) > static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages, > bool dirty) > { > - struct page **p = chunk->plist; > - > - while (num_pages--) { > - if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty) > - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1); > - else > - put_user_page(*p); > - p++; > - } > + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(chunk->plist, num_pages, dirty); siw_free_plist should just go away now. Otherwise this looks good to me.