From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:37210 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727039AbfHNLSl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:18:41 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:18:37 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Use FIEMAP for FIBMAP calls
Message-ID: <20190814111837.GE1885@lst.de>
References: <20190808082744.31405-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> <20190808082744.31405-9-cmaiolino@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190808082744.31405-9-cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, adilger@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, rpeterso@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org

The whole FIEMAP_KERNEL_FIBMAP thing looks very counter productive.
bmap() should be able to make the right decision based on the passed
in flags, no need to have a fake FIEMAP flag for that.