From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ACEC3A59B for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD14A2146E for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725958AbfHSELg (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:11:36 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44095 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725871AbfHSELg (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:11:36 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EDEAE68B02; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 06:11:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 06:11:32 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Dave Chinner Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "Verma, Vishal L" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Williams, Dan J" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" Subject: Re: 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery Message-ID: <20190819041132.GA14492@lst.de> References: <20190818071128.GA17286@lst.de> <20190818074140.GA18648@lst.de> <20190818173426.GA32311@lst.de> <20190819000831.GX6129@dread.disaster.area> <20190819034948.GA14261@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190819034948.GA14261@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 05:49:48AM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote: > The fake pmem was create by the following kernel command line sniplet: > "memmap=2000M!1024M,2000M!4096M" and my kernel config is attached. I > suspect you'll need CONFIG_SLUB to create the woes, but let me confirm > that.. Yep, doesn't reproduce with CONFIG_SLAB.