From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"darrick.wong@oracle.com" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:26:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190821002643.GK1119@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190818173426.GA32311@lst.de>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:34:26PM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:41:40AM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:11:28AM +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:
> > > > The kernel log shows the following when the mount fails:
> > >
> > > Is it always that same message? I'll see if I can reproduce it,
> > > but I won't have that much memory to spare to create fake pmem,
> > > hope this also works with a single device and/or less memory..
> >
> > I've reproduced a similar ASSERT with a small pmem device, so I hope
> > I can debug the issue locally now.
>
> So I can also reproduce the same issue with the ramdisk driver, but not
> with any other 4k sector size device (nvmet, scsi target, scsi_debug,
> loop). Which made me wonder if there is some issue about the memory
> passed in, and indeed just switching to plain vmalloc vs the XFS
> kmem_alloc_large wrapper that either uses kmalloc or vmalloc fixes
> the issue for me. I don't really understand why yet, maybe I need to
> dig out alignment testing patches.
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index 13d1d3e95b88..918ad3b884a7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ xlog_alloc_buffer(
> if (nbblks > 1 && log->l_sectBBsize > 1)
> nbblks += log->l_sectBBsize;
> nbblks = round_up(nbblks, log->l_sectBBsize);
> - return kmem_alloc_large(BBTOB(nbblks), KM_MAYFAIL);
> + return vmalloc(BBTOB(nbblks));
> }
After thinking on this for a bit, I suspect the better thing to do
here is add a KM_ALIGNED flag to the allocation, so if the internal
kmem_alloc() returns an unaligned pointer we free it and fall
through to vmalloc() to get a properly aligned pointer....
That way none of the other interfaces have to change, and we can
then use kmem_alloc_large() everywhere we allocate buffers for IO.
And we don't need new infrastructure just to support these debug
configurations, either.
Actually, kmem_alloc_io() might be a better idea - keep the aligned
flag internal to the kmem code. Seems like a pretty simple solution
to the entire problem we have here...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-21 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 20:59 5.3-rc1 regression with XFS log recovery Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-18 7:11 ` hch
2019-08-18 7:41 ` hch
2019-08-18 17:34 ` hch
2019-08-19 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19 3:49 ` hch
2019-08-19 4:11 ` hch
2019-08-19 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19 4:29 ` hch
2019-08-19 4:40 ` hch
2019-08-19 5:31 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 6:14 ` hch
2019-08-20 4:41 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 5:53 ` hch
2019-08-20 7:44 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 8:13 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-20 9:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-20 16:30 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-20 21:44 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 22:08 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-20 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-21 2:19 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-21 1:56 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-19 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-19 17:19 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-21 0:26 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-08-21 0:44 ` hch
2019-08-21 1:08 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-21 1:56 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-08-21 6:15 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-26 17:32 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190821002643.GK1119@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox