public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] libxfs: move topology declarations into separate header
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:43:04 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190830054304.GD1119@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156633308405.1215978.11329921136072672886.stgit@magnolia>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:31:24PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> The topology functions live in libfrog now, which means their
> declarations don't belong in libxcmd.h.  Create new header file for
> them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/libxcmd.h  |   31 -------------------------------
>  include/topology.h |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  libfrog/topology.c |    1 +
>  mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c    |    2 +-
>  repair/sb.c        |    1 +
>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/topology.h

I like the idea, but I'm wondering if we should have a similar
setup to libxfs header files here.

i.e. the header file lives in libfrog/, and the install-headers make
command creates include/libxfrog and links them for the build. That
way the includes become namespaced like:

#include "libxfrog/topology,h"

and we don't pollute include with random header files from all
different parts of xfsprogs...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20 20:31 [PATCH 00/12] xfsprogs-5.3: various fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 01/12] libxfs-diff: try harder to find the kernel equivalent libxfs files Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:38   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30  5:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] libxfs: move topology declarations into separate header Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:43   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-08-30 20:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02 22:33       ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-03  3:16         ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-03 17:15         ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 03/12] libfrog: try the v4 fs geometry ioctl after failing the v5 ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:43   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 04/12] man: document the new v5 fs geometry ioctl structures Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:44   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 05/12] man: document new fs summary counter scrub command Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:45   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 06/12] man: document the new allocation group geometry ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:53   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:48     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02 22:36       ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-03  3:22         ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:31 ` [PATCH 07/12] man: document the new health reporting fields in various ioctls Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:57   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs_db: remove db/convert.h Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  5:58   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs_db: add a function to compute btree geometry Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  6:12   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs_db: use precomputed inode geometry values Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  6:13   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs_repair: " Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  6:17   ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-30 20:52     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs_repair: reduce the amount of "clearing reflink flag" messages Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30  6:19   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190830054304.GD1119@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox