public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add a xfs_valid_startblock helper
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:06:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190830150650.GA5354@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830102411.519-2-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:24:09PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper that validates the startblock is valid.  This checks for a
> non-zero block on the main device, but skips that check for blocks on
> the realtime device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 2 +-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h | 3 +++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c       | 6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 05aedf4a538c..80b25e21e708 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4519,7 +4519,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc(
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bma.blkno == NULLFSBLOCK))
>  		goto out_finish;
>  	error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bma.got.br_startblock && !XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!xfs_valid_startblock(ip, bma.got.br_startblock)))
>  		goto out_finish;
>  
>  	XFS_STATS_ADD(mp, xs_xstrat_bytes, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, bma.length));
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> index c409871a096e..7efa56e8750f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ static inline bool xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec)
>  		!isnullstartblock(irec->br_startblock);
>  }
>  
> +#define xfs_valid_startblock(ip, startblock) \
> +	((startblock) != 0 || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))

We have more robust validators for data/rtdev fsblock_t, so why not:

#define xfs_valid_startblock(ip, startblock) \
	(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ? xfs_verify_rtbno(startblock) : \
				     xfs_verify_fsbno(startblock))

and why not make it a static inline function too?

--D

> +
>  void	xfs_trim_extent(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, xfs_fileoff_t bno,
>  		xfs_filblks_t len);
>  int	xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(struct xfs_inode *ip, int size, int rsvd);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 3a4310d7cb59..f780e223b118 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!imap->br_startblock && !XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> +	if (unlikely(!xfs_valid_startblock(ip, imap->br_startblock)))
>  		return xfs_alert_fsblock_zero(ip, imap);
>  
>  	if (imap->br_startblock == HOLESTARTBLOCK) {
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!(imap->br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> +	if (unlikely(!xfs_valid_startblock(ip, imap->br_startblock)))
>  		error = xfs_alert_fsblock_zero(ip, imap);
>  
>  out_unlock:
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(
>  		if (error)
>  			return error;
>  
> -		if (!(imap.br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> +		if (unlikely(!xfs_valid_startblock(ip, imap.br_startblock)))
>  			return xfs_alert_fsblock_zero(ip, &imap);
>  
>  		if ((numblks_fsb = imap.br_blockcount) == 0) {
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30 10:24 misc cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add a xfs_valid_startblock helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 15:06   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-08-30 15:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-01  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-01 20:31         ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02  7:59           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-02 17:04             ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-02 17:07               ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: cleanup xfs_fsb_to_db Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 15:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-30 10:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: remove the unused XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA flag Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 15:08   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190830150650.GA5354@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox