From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B93C4CEC9 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE09B2171F for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="L/hkMD2x" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728931AbfIQQjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:42 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:40964 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727168AbfIQQjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:42 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8HGcxxj187021; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:37 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=tMpcYxjKpxRAVuSkaRn3UAy6CIrrNIx2H09pahTPpws=; b=L/hkMD2xuISGmAW8LcNvWBlXvExe/CzqAc15argPsKCX3V8QdFWK+DokPb95UJzzFO9k joSwipnPah5WPF1w1LKs1QHboXFloGzOosiV2+2ZOjUpDSaT0JUP8CiWenVffDJCegIP nYuV5xEzVWKHITEsPzz6+fOuvXootf3scdGCPUjGU6PUIVUUN4bh0SYfqKvGmbQJGaR0 itqimkqmvnBK7Ctfj2ZtdAJVVG9wLjKzInNOoJ1hMiGwFOoW5H/ajugfK4GqkRaL7+N0 ss2xmCtjB220kQTEw8PhR88XF0Hvglm3sStj7MhqiwDmxSifEWiVQSmG1Z267okAqisG bQ== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2v0r5pfrha-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8HGcsYl143288; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:36 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2v2jjtgwxj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:36 +0000 Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8HGdZg7016287; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:39:35 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:39:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:39:33 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: "Xu, Yang" Cc: "fstests@vger.kernel.org" , xfs Subject: Re: question of xfs/148 and xfs/149 Message-ID: <20190917163933.GC736475@magnolia> References: <4BF2FD5A942B1C4B828DDAF5635768C1041AB0E2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF2FD5A942B1C4B828DDAF5635768C1041AB0E2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9383 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=997 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909170159 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9383 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909170159 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org [add linux-xfs to cc] On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:00:57AM +0000, Xu, Yang wrote: > HI All > > When I investigated xfs/030 failure on upstream kernel after mering > xfstests commit d0e484ac699f ("check: wipe scratch devices between > tests"), I found two similar cases(xfs/148,xfs/149). > > xfs/148 is a clone of test 030 using xfs_prepair64 instead of xfs_repair. > xfs/149 is a clone of test 031 using xfs_prepair instead of xfs_repair > > But I don't find these two commands and know nothing about them. If > these commands have been obsoleted long time ago, I think we can > remove the two cases. Or may I miss something? I think your analysis is correct, but let's see what the xfs list thinks. --D > > Thanks > Yang Xu > >