From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] xfs: optimize near mode bnobt scans with concurrent cntbt lookups
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:11:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918211158.GA2229799@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916121635.43148-12-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:16:35AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The near mode fallback algorithm consists of a left/right scan of
> the bnobt. This algorithm has very poor breakdown characteristics
> under worst case free space fragmentation conditions. If a suitable
> extent is far enough from the locality hint, each allocation may
> scan most or all of the bnobt before it completes. This causes
> pathological behavior and extremely high allocation latencies.
>
> While locality is important to near mode allocations, it is not so
> important as to incur pathological allocation latency to provide the
> asolute best available locality for every allocation. If the
> allocation is large enough or far enough away, there is a point of
> diminishing returns. As such, we can bound the overall operation by
> including an iterative cntbt lookup in the broader search. The cntbt
> lookup is optimized to immediately find the extent with best
> locality for the given size on each iteration. Since the cntbt is
> indexed by extent size, the lookup repeats with a variably
> aggressive increasing search key size until it runs off the edge of
> the tree.
>
> This approach provides a natural balance between the two algorithms
> for various situations. For example, the bnobt scan is able to
> satisfy smaller allocations such as for inode chunks or btree blocks
> more quickly where the cntbt search may have to search through a
> large set of extent sizes when the search key starts off small
> relative to the largest extent in the tree. On the other hand, the
> cntbt search more deterministically covers the set of suitable
> extents for larger data extent allocation requests that the bnobt
> scan may have to search the entire tree to locate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> index 381a08257aaf..4ec22040e516 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ struct xfs_alloc_cur {
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cnt; /* btree cursors */
> struct xfs_btree_cur *bnolt;
> struct xfs_btree_cur *bnogt;
> + xfs_extlen_t cur_len;/* current search length */
> xfs_agblock_t rec_bno;/* extent startblock */
> xfs_extlen_t rec_len;/* extent length */
> xfs_agblock_t bno; /* alloc bno */
> @@ -740,6 +741,7 @@ xfs_alloc_cur_setup(
>
> ASSERT(args->alignment == 1 || args->type != XFS_ALLOCTYPE_THIS_BNO);
>
> + acur->cur_len = args->maxlen;
> acur->rec_bno = 0;
> acur->rec_len = 0;
> acur->bno = 0;
> @@ -913,6 +915,76 @@ xfs_alloc_cur_finish(
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Locality allocation lookup algorithm. This expects a cntbt cursor and uses
> + * bno optimized lookup to search for extents with ideal size and locality.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_alloc_cntbt_iter(
> + struct xfs_alloc_arg *args,
> + struct xfs_alloc_cur *acur)
> +{
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur = acur->cnt;
> + xfs_agblock_t bno;
> + xfs_extlen_t len, cur_len;
> + int error;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!xfs_alloc_cur_active(cur))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* locality optimized lookup */
> + cur_len = acur->cur_len;
> + error = xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(cur, args->agbno, cur_len, &i);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + if (i == 0)
> + return 0;
> + error = xfs_alloc_get_rec(cur, &bno, &len, &i);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + /* check the current record and update search length from it */
> + error = xfs_alloc_cur_check(args, acur, cur, &i);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + ASSERT(len >= acur->cur_len);
> + acur->cur_len = len;
> +
> + /*
> + * We looked up the first record >= [agbno, len] above. The agbno is a
> + * secondary key and so the current record may lie just before or after
> + * agbno. If it is past agbno, check the previous record too so long as
> + * the length matches as it may be closer. Don't check a smaller record
> + * because that could deactivate our cursor.
> + */
> + if (bno > args->agbno) {
> + error = xfs_btree_decrement(cur, 0, &i);
> + if (!error && i) {
> + error = xfs_alloc_get_rec(cur, &bno, &len, &i);
> + if (!error && i && len == acur->cur_len)
> + error = xfs_alloc_cur_check(args, acur, cur,
> + &i);
> + }
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Increment the search key until we find at least one allocation
> + * candidate or if the extent we found was larger. Otherwise, double the
> + * search key to optimize the search. Efficiency is more important here
> + * than absolute best locality.
> + */
> + cur_len <<= 1;
> + if (!acur->len || acur->cur_len >= cur_len)
> + acur->cur_len++;
> + else
> + acur->cur_len = cur_len;
> +
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Deal with the case where only small freespaces remain. Either return the
> * contents of the last freespace record, or allocate space from the freelist if
> @@ -1254,12 +1326,11 @@ xfs_alloc_walk_iter(
> }
>
> /*
> - * Search in the by-bno btree to the left and to the right simultaneously until
> - * in each case we find a large enough free extent or run into the edge of the
> - * tree. When we run into the edge of the tree, we deactivate that cursor.
> + * Search the by-bno and by-size btrees in parallel in search of an extent with
> + * ideal locality based on the NEAR mode ->agbno locality hint.
> */
> STATIC int
> -xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(
> +xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_locality(
> struct xfs_alloc_arg *args,
> struct xfs_alloc_cur *acur,
> int *stat)
> @@ -1274,6 +1345,9 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(
>
> *stat = 0;
>
> + error = xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(acur->cnt, args->agbno, acur->cur_len, &i);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> error = xfs_alloc_lookup_le(acur->bnolt, args->agbno, 0, &i);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -1282,12 +1356,37 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(
> return error;
>
> /*
> - * Loop going left with the leftward cursor, right with the rightward
> - * cursor, until either both directions give up or we find an entry at
> - * least as big as minlen.
> + * Search the bnobt and cntbt in parallel. Search the bnobt left and
> + * right and lookup the closest extent to the locality hint for each
> + * extent size key in the cntbt. The entire search terminates
> + * immediately on a bnobt hit because that means we've found best case
> + * locality. Otherwise the search continues until the cntbt cursor runs
> + * off the end of the tree. If no allocation candidate is found at this
> + * point, give up on locality, walk backwards from the end of the cntbt
> + * and take the first available extent.
> + *
> + * The parallel tree searches balance each other out to provide fairly
> + * consistent performance for various situations. The bnobt search can
> + * have pathological behavior in the worst case scenario of larger
> + * allocation requests and fragmented free space. On the other hand, the
> + * bnobt is able to satisfy most smaller allocation requests much more
> + * quickly than the cntbt. The cntbt search can sift through fragmented
> + * free space and sets of free extents for larger allocation requests
> + * more quickly than the bnobt. Since the locality hint is just a hint
> + * and we don't want to scan the entire bnobt for perfect locality, the
> + * cntbt search essentially bounds the bnobt search such that we can
> + * find good enough locality at reasonable performance in most cases.
> */
> while (xfs_alloc_cur_active(acur->bnolt) ||
> - xfs_alloc_cur_active(acur->bnogt)) {
> + xfs_alloc_cur_active(acur->bnogt) ||
> + xfs_alloc_cur_active(acur->cnt)) {
> +
> + trace_xfs_alloc_cur_lookup(args);
> +
> + /*
> + * Search the bnobt left and right. In the case of a hit, finish
> + * the search in the opposite direction and we're done.
> + */
> error = xfs_alloc_walk_iter(args, acur, acur->bnolt, false,
> true, 1, &i);
> if (error)
> @@ -1298,7 +1397,6 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(
> fbinc = true;
> break;
> }
> -
> error = xfs_alloc_walk_iter(args, acur, acur->bnogt, true, true,
> 1, &i);
> if (error)
> @@ -1309,9 +1407,39 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(
> fbinc = false;
> break;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Check the extent with best locality based on the current
> + * extent size search key and keep track of the best candidate.
> + * If we fail to find anything due to busy extents, return
> + * empty handed so the caller can flush and retry the search. If
> + * no busy extents were found, walk backwards from the end of
> + * the cntbt as a last resort.
> + */
> + error = xfs_alloc_cntbt_iter(args, acur);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + if (!xfs_alloc_cur_active(acur->cnt)) {
> + trace_xfs_alloc_cur_lookup_done(args);
> + if (!acur->len && !acur->busy) {
> + error = xfs_btree_decrement(acur->cnt, 0, &i);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + if (i) {
> + acur->cnt->bc_private.a.priv.abt.active = true;
Line over 80 columns?
Or, put another way, could this be refactored not to have 5 levels of
indent?
Otherwise looks good.
--D
> + fbcur = acur->cnt;
> + fbinc = false;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> }
>
> - /* search the opposite direction for a better entry */
> + /*
> + * Search in the opposite direction for a better entry in the case of
> + * a bnobt hit or walk backwards from the end of the cntbt.
> + */
> if (fbcur) {
> error = xfs_alloc_walk_iter(args, acur, fbcur, fbinc, true, -1,
> &i);
> @@ -1440,9 +1568,10 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(
> }
>
> /*
> - * Second algorithm. Search the bnobt left and right.
> + * Second algorithm. Combined cntbt and bnobt search to find ideal
> + * locality.
> */
> - error = xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_bnobt(args, &acur, &i);
> + error = xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_locality(args, &acur, &i);
> if (error)
> goto out;
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> index b8b93068efe7..0c9dfeac4e75 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> @@ -1645,6 +1645,8 @@ DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_near_first);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_cur);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_cur_right);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_cur_left);
> +DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_cur_lookup);
> +DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_cur_lookup_done);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_near_error);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_near_noentry);
> DEFINE_ALLOC_EVENT(xfs_alloc_near_busy);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 12:16 [PATCH v4 00/11] xfs: rework near mode extent allocation Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] xfs: track active state of allocation btree cursors Brian Foster
2019-09-18 18:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 14:57 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] xfs: introduce allocation cursor data structure Brian Foster
2019-09-18 18:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] xfs: track allocation busy state in allocation cursor Brian Foster
2019-09-18 18:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 14:58 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] xfs: track best extent from cntbt lastblock scan in alloc cursor Brian Foster
2019-09-18 18:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 15:00 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] xfs: refactor cntbt lastblock scan best extent logic into helper Brian Foster
2019-09-18 19:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 15:01 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] xfs: reuse best extent tracking logic for bnobt scan Brian Foster
2019-09-18 20:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 15:04 ` Brian Foster
2019-10-04 22:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-07 11:08 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] xfs: refactor allocation tree fixup code Brian Foster
2019-09-18 20:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] xfs: refactor and reuse best extent scanning logic Brian Foster
2019-09-18 21:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-19 15:04 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] xfs: refactor near mode alloc bnobt scan into separate function Brian Foster
2019-09-18 20:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] xfs: factor out tree fixup logic into helper Brian Foster
2019-09-18 20:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-16 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] xfs: optimize near mode bnobt scans with concurrent cntbt lookups Brian Foster
2019-09-18 21:11 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-09-19 15:05 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190918211158.GA2229799@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox