From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Limit total allocation request to maximum possible
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:53:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190925115308.GA21991@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190924205029.GF16973@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 06:50:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:24:53AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > The original allocation request may have a total value way beyond
> > possible limits.
> >
> > Trim it down to the maximum possible if needed
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > index 07aad70f3931..3aa0bf5cc7e3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > @@ -3477,6 +3477,11 @@ xfs_bmap_btalloc(
> > error = xfs_bmap_btalloc_filestreams(ap, &args, &blen);
> > else
> > error = xfs_bmap_btalloc_nullfb(ap, &args, &blen);
> > +
> > + /* We can never have total larger than blen, so trim it now */
>
> Yes we can. blen is typically the largest contiguous extent in the
> filesystem or AG in question. It is not typically the total free
> space in the AG, which only occurs when the AG is empty. i.e. in
> normal situations, we can allocate both blen and the rest of the
> metadata from the same AG as there is more than one free extent in
> the AG.
>
Right..
> I think that for the purposes of a single > AG size allocation, the
> total needs to be clamped to the free space in the AG that is
> selected, not the length of the allocation we are trying....
>
As already noted, I do think args.total could use some work. But unless
I'm missing something about the set of callers modified in the original
patch, I'd rather not tweak a core bmap mechanism in service to callers
that have no reason to use said mechanism in the first place.
And I know that such a change would affect legitimate args.total users
too and so still might be appropriate, I just think that's something for
a separate patch (even if in the same series)...
Brian
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-18 8:24 [PATCH RFC 0/2] A small improvement in the allocation algorithm Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-18 8:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: cap longest free extent to maximum allocatable Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-18 12:27 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-23 12:25 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-18 8:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Limit total allocation request to maximum possible Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-18 12:28 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-23 12:39 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-23 13:11 ` Brian Foster
2019-09-24 8:07 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-09-24 20:50 ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-25 11:53 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190925115308.GA21991@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox