From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:27:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016052713.GX13108@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016051101.12620-1-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:11:01PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When doing a direct IO that spans the current EOF, and there are
> written blocks beyond EOF that extend beyond the current write, the
> only metadata update that needs to be done is a file size extension.
>
> However, we don't mark such iomaps as IOMAP_F_DIRTY to indicate that
> there is IO completion metadata updates required, and hence we may
> fail to correctly sync file size extensions made in IO completion
> when O_DSYNC writes are beingt used and the hardware supports FUA.
>
> Hence when setting IOMAP_F_DIRTY, we need to also take into account
> whether the iomap spans the current EOF. If it does, then we need to
> mark it dirty so that IO completion will call generic_write_sync()
> to flush the inode size update to stable storage correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/iomap.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 516faa280ced..e9dc52537e5b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3523,9 +3523,16 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Writes that span EOF might trigger an IO size update on completion,
> + * so consider them to be dirty for the purposes of O_DSYNC even if
> + * there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending here.
> + */
> iomap->flags = 0;
> - if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(inode))
> + if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(inode) ||
> + offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
> iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> +
> iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
> iomap->dax_dev = sbi->s_daxdev;
> iomap->offset = (u64)first_block << blkbits;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index f780e223b118..38be06f19ea2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -722,6 +722,14 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(
> xfs_trim_extent(&imap, cmap.br_startoff, cmap.br_blockcount);
> shared = true;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Writes that span EOF might trigger an IO size update on completion,
> + * so consider them to be dirty for the purposes of O_DSYNC even if
> + * there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending here.
> + */
> + if (offset + count > i_size_read(inode))
> + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
This ought to be in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(), right?
(Hoping to see another rev of Christoph's iomap cleanup series... ;))
--D
> error = xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, iomap, &imap, shared);
> out_unlock:
> xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index 7aa5d6117936..24bd227d59f9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct vm_fault;
> *
> * IOMAP_F_DIRTY indicates the inode has uncommitted metadata needed to access
> * written data and requires fdatasync to commit them to persistent storage.
> + * This needs to take into account metadata changes that *may* be made at IO
> + * completion, such as file size updates from direct IO.
> */
> #define IOMAP_F_NEW 0x01 /* blocks have been newly allocated */
> #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY 0x02 /* uncommitted metadata */
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 5:11 [PATCH] iomap: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty Dave Chinner
2019-10-16 5:25 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-16 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-10-16 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-16 6:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Dave Chinner
2019-10-16 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-17 12:29 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-17 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-17 14:48 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191016052713.GX13108@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox