From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163DECA9EA9 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCCA21897 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="SgSMf5ZR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393957AbfJRRRp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:17:45 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:41450 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392037AbfJRRRp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:17:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9IHDmwr068848; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:23 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=paSHr/9BvPUzQLB9ZQtu71SOXlstNB4nJhrbDEukRHw=; b=SgSMf5ZRb8UNTisYbAJxCoP1KmKRRMiA0IZccPiTCdAsdegi1cJviRvH8csXgu/3XzCy 1l16q6XSKpnKDR136LaSkGnzhE5hRJODJaIt4EDJy17UEj6VFwlzlffGdMGnAd+EUyo4 2lpi60U1f6OWtTtP5bcKJG3P44L0kqU4MiGrxmdh3mHLSLFAruBF57QB4vcgdF6aUOL2 2a/ajSSfV0NrL/3OM8CtfvdFmhBr8rhpWwRyHZLRHHnv6wOHjUhoIyVhu8LCw5tTheQr psQNXzSrnDR+rjs4u4/GLKiJfc7hBtYrtfkPmv04AbDAZlOKtmR0/0n6fEFwfRei40Bq 9w== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2vq0q4552k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:23 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9IHDBSa086950; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:22 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2vq0dy7e3c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:22 +0000 Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x9IHHMQR006706; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:22 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:17:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:17:20 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Brian Foster Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 0/2] xfs: rely on minleft instead of total for bmbt res Message-ID: <20191018171720.GB6719@magnolia> References: <20190912143223.24194-1-bfoster@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190912143223.24194-1-bfoster@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9414 signatures=668684 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910180157 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9414 signatures=668684 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910180157 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:32:21AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a repost of a couple patches I posted a few months ago[1]. There > are no changes other than a rebase to for-next. Any thoughts on these? I > think Carlos had also run into some related generic/223 failures fairly > recently... > > Carlos, > > Any chance you could give these a try? Any progress on this in the last month? I /think/ this is related to the unaligned allocations that Dan's complaining about this morning. --D > Brian > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20190501140504.16435-1-bfoster@redhat.com/ > > Brian Foster (2): > xfs: drop minlen before tossing alignment on bmap allocs > xfs: don't set bmapi total block req where minleft is sufficient > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 13 +++++++++---- > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 ++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 4 ++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 4 ++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 4 ++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 3 +-- > 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 >