From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: softlockup with CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_SCRUB enabled
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:58:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029035831.GE15221@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028073003.GA20274@lst.de>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 11:32:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:24:04PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi Darrick,
> > >
> > > the current xfs tree seems to easily cause sotlockups in generic/175
> > > (and a few other tests, but not as reproducible) for me. This is on
> > > 20GB 4k block size images on a VM with 4 CPUs and 4G of RAM.
> >
> > Hrm. I haven't seen that before... what's your kernel config?
> > This looks like some kind of lockup in slub debugging...?
> >
> > Also, is this a new thing? Or something that used to happen with low
> > frequency but has slowly increased to the point that it's annoying?
> >
> > (Or something else?)
>
> Seems to happen with 5.3 as well. I only recently turned
> CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_SCRUB back on in my usual test config, that is what
> made it show up..
>
> .config attached.
Aha, you have preempt disabled and slub debugging on by default, which
(on the million-extent files produced by generic/175) mean that scrub
takes long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog while checking the
bmap. The test eventually finishes, but the obvious(ly stupid) bandaid
of calling touch_softlockup_watchdog merely plunged the VM into
"rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU" messages and as it's late I'll
set it aside until tomorrow.
IOWs I think I know what's going on but don't yet know how to fix it. :/
--D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 10:24 softlockup with CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_SCRUB enabled Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-27 18:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-28 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-29 3:58 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191029035831.GE15221@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox