From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1518CA9EB5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C660520B7C for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729186AbfKDNbM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:31:12 -0500 Received: from mail1.g1.pair.com ([66.39.3.162]:37028 "EHLO mail1.g1.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728783AbfKDNbM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:31:12 -0500 Received: from mail1.g1.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.g1.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F59F547456; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from harpe.intellique.com (labo.djinux.com [82.225.196.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.g1.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFA7F60AE84; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:31:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:31:13 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac To: Brian Foster Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: xfs_repair keeps reporting errors Message-ID: <20191104143113.682d1e9d@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: <20191101104551.GB59146@bfoster> References: <20191031154049.166549a3@harpe.intellique.com> <20191101104551.GB59146@bfoster> Organization: Intellique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/c5VU_JgeIJk3H52Nz0WV/hO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/c5VU_JgeIJk3H52Nz0WV/hO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:45:51 -0400 Brian Foster =C3=A9crivait: > I think it's hard to say what might be going on here without some view > into the state of the fs. Perhaps some large chunk of the fs has been > zeroed given all of the zeroed out on-disk inode fields? We'd probably > want to see a metadump of the fs to get a closer look. >=20 Alas, the metadump is 28 GB... (this is a 500 TB filesystem). So far it seems to behave better with no background RAID controller operation. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --Sig_/c5VU_JgeIJk3H52Nz0WV/hO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAl3AKCIACgkQX3jQXNUicVbdCQCeKa04XIaTdHPClKaT471H8UMo c6YAoJUHiF0Zwcx/zVpVfZ1uh76YTYUI =JXZW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/c5VU_JgeIJk3H52Nz0WV/hO--