From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: kaixuxia <xiakaixu1987@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com,
newtongao@tencent.com, jasperwang@tencent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: Fix deadlock between AGI and AGF when target_ip exists in xfs_rename()
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:34:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191112163414.GA6219@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573557210-6241-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 07:13:30PM +0800, kaixuxia wrote:
> When target_ip exists in xfs_rename(), the xfs_dir_replace() call may
> need to hold the AGF lock to allocate more blocks, and then invoking
> the xfs_droplink() call to hold AGI lock to drop target_ip onto the
> unlinked list, so we get the lock order AGF->AGI. This would break the
> ordering constraint on AGI and AGF locking - inode allocation locks
> the AGI, then can allocate a new extent for new inodes, locking the
> AGF after the AGI.
>
> In this patch we check whether the replace operation need more
> blocks firstly. If so, acquire the agi lock firstly to preserve
> locking order(AGI/AGF). Actually, the locking order problem only
> occurs when we are locking the AGI/AGF of the same AG. For multiple
> AGs the AGI lock will be released after the transaction committed.
>
> Signed-off-by: kaixuxia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> -Remove the typedef usages.
> -Invoke xfs_dir2_sf_replace_needblock() in
> xfs_dir2_sf_replace() directly.
>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h | 2 ++
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> index f542447..01b1722 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.h
> @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ extern int xfs_dir_lookup(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_inode *dp,
> extern int xfs_dir_removename(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_inode *dp,
> struct xfs_name *name, xfs_ino_t ino,
> xfs_extlen_t tot);
> +extern bool xfs_dir2_sf_replace_needblock(struct xfs_inode *dp,
> + xfs_ino_t inum);
> extern int xfs_dir_replace(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_inode *dp,
> struct xfs_name *name, xfs_ino_t inum,
> xfs_extlen_t tot);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c
> index 85f14fc..0e112e1 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c
> @@ -945,6 +945,27 @@ static int xfs_dir2_sf_addname_pick(xfs_da_args_t *args, int objchange,
> }
>
> /*
> + * Check whether the sf dir replace operation need more blocks.
> + */
> +bool
> +xfs_dir2_sf_replace_needblock(
> + struct xfs_inode *dp,
> + xfs_ino_t inum)
> +{
> + int newsize;
> + struct xfs_dir2_sf_hdr *sfp;
> +
> + if (dp->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL)
> + return false;
> +
> + sfp = (struct xfs_dir2_sf_hdr *)dp->i_df.if_u1.if_data;
> + newsize = dp->i_df.if_bytes + (sfp->count + 1) * XFS_INO64_DIFF;
> +
> + return inum > XFS_DIR2_MAX_SHORT_INUM &&
> + sfp->i8count == 0 && newsize > XFS_IFORK_DSIZE(dp);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Replace the inode number of an entry in a shortform directory.
> */
> int /* error */
> @@ -980,17 +1001,14 @@ static int xfs_dir2_sf_addname_pick(xfs_da_args_t *args, int objchange,
> */
> if (args->inumber > XFS_DIR2_MAX_SHORT_INUM && sfp->i8count == 0) {
> int error; /* error return value */
> - int newsize; /* new inode size */
>
> - newsize = dp->i_df.if_bytes + (sfp->count + 1) * XFS_INO64_DIFF;
> /*
> * Won't fit as shortform, convert to block then do replace.
> */
> - if (newsize > XFS_IFORK_DSIZE(dp)) {
> + if (xfs_dir2_sf_replace_needblock(dp, args->inumber)) {
> error = xfs_dir2_sf_to_block(args);
> - if (error) {
> + if (error)
> return error;
> - }
> return xfs_dir2_block_replace(args);
> }
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 18f4b26..5dc3796 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -3196,6 +3196,7 @@ struct xfs_iunlink {
> struct xfs_trans *tp;
> struct xfs_inode *wip = NULL; /* whiteout inode */
> struct xfs_inode *inodes[__XFS_SORT_INODES];
> + struct xfs_buf *agibp;
> int num_inodes = __XFS_SORT_INODES;
> bool new_parent = (src_dp != target_dp);
> bool src_is_directory = S_ISDIR(VFS_I(src_ip)->i_mode);
> @@ -3361,6 +3362,20 @@ struct xfs_iunlink {
> * In case there is already an entry with the same
> * name at the destination directory, remove it first.
> */
> +
> + /*
> + * Check whether the replace operation need more blocks.
> + * If so, acquire the agi lock firstly to preserve locking
> + * order (AGI/AGF). Only convert the shortform directory to
> + * block form maybe need more blocks.
The comment still seems a little clunky. How about:
"Check whether the replace operation will need to allocate blocks. This
happens when the shortform directory lacks space and we have to convert
it to a block format directory. When more blocks are necessary we must
lock the AGI first to preserve locking order (AGI -> AGF)."
> + */
> + if (xfs_dir2_sf_replace_needblock(target_dp, src_ip->i_ino)) {
> + error = xfs_read_agi(mp, tp,
> + XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, target_ip->i_ino), &agibp);
The second line needs a double indent.
I can fix both of these on commit if Brian doesn't have any further
suggestions.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> + if (error)
> + goto out_trans_cancel;
> + }
> +
> error = xfs_dir_replace(tp, target_dp, target_name,
> src_ip->i_ino, spaceres);
> if (error)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 11:13 [PATCH v4] xfs: Fix deadlock between AGI and AGF when target_ip exists in xfs_rename() kaixuxia
2019-11-12 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-11-12 16:59 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191112163414.GA6219@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=jasperwang@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtongao@tencent.com \
--cc=xiakaixu1987@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox