From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 102/219] xfs: Fix bulkstat compat ioctls on x32 userspace.
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:47:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122054911.1750-95-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122054911.1750-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
[ Upstream commit 7ca860e3c1a74ad6bd8949364073ef1044cad758 ]
The bulkstat family of ioctls are problematic on x32, because there is
a mixup of native 32-bit and 64-bit conventions. The xfs_fsop_bulkreq
struct contains pointers and 32-bit integers so that matches the native
32-bit layout, and that means the ioctl implementation goes into the
regular compat path on x32.
However, the 'ubuffer' member of that struct in turn refers to either
struct xfs_inogrp or xfs_bstat (or an array of these). On x32, those
structures match the native 64-bit layout. The compat implementation
writes out the 32-bit version of these structures. This is not the
expected format for x32 userspace, causing problems.
Fortunately the functions which actually output these xfs_inogrp and
xfs_bstat structures have an easy way to select which output format
is required, so we just need a little tweak to select the right format
on x32.
Signed-off-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
index 4c34efcbf7e80..b044f7d36782c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
@@ -241,6 +241,32 @@ xfs_compat_ioc_bulkstat(
int done;
int error;
+ /*
+ * Output structure handling functions. Depending on the command,
+ * either the xfs_bstat and xfs_inogrp structures are written out
+ * to userpace memory via bulkreq.ubuffer. Normally the compat
+ * functions and structure size are the correct ones to use ...
+ */
+ inumbers_fmt_pf inumbers_func = xfs_inumbers_fmt_compat;
+ bulkstat_one_pf bs_one_func = xfs_bulkstat_one_compat;
+ size_t bs_one_size = sizeof(struct compat_xfs_bstat);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
+ if (in_x32_syscall()) {
+ /*
+ * ... but on x32 the input xfs_fsop_bulkreq has pointers
+ * which must be handled in the "compat" (32-bit) way, while
+ * the xfs_bstat and xfs_inogrp structures follow native 64-
+ * bit layout convention. So adjust accordingly, otherwise
+ * the data written out in compat layout will not match what
+ * x32 userspace expects.
+ */
+ inumbers_func = xfs_inumbers_fmt;
+ bs_one_func = xfs_bulkstat_one;
+ bs_one_size = sizeof(struct xfs_bstat);
+ }
+#endif
+
/* done = 1 if there are more stats to get and if bulkstat */
/* should be called again (unused here, but used in dmapi) */
@@ -272,15 +298,15 @@ xfs_compat_ioc_bulkstat(
if (cmd == XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS_32) {
error = xfs_inumbers(mp, &inlast, &count,
- bulkreq.ubuffer, xfs_inumbers_fmt_compat);
+ bulkreq.ubuffer, inumbers_func);
} else if (cmd == XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_SINGLE_32) {
int res;
- error = xfs_bulkstat_one_compat(mp, inlast, bulkreq.ubuffer,
- sizeof(compat_xfs_bstat_t), NULL, &res);
+ error = bs_one_func(mp, inlast, bulkreq.ubuffer,
+ bs_one_size, NULL, &res);
} else if (cmd == XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT_32) {
error = xfs_bulkstat(mp, &inlast, &count,
- xfs_bulkstat_one_compat, sizeof(compat_xfs_bstat_t),
+ bs_one_func, bs_one_size,
bulkreq.ubuffer, &done);
} else
error = -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191122054911.1750-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-11-22 5:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 034/219] xfs: zero length symlinks are not valid Sasha Levin
2019-11-22 5:46 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 051/219] xfs: require both realtime inodes to mount Sasha Levin
2019-11-22 5:47 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 101/219] xfs: Align compat attrlist_by_handle with native implementation Sasha Levin
2019-11-22 5:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-11-22 5:48 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 183/219] xfs: end sync buffer I/O properly on shutdown error Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122054911.1750-95-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbowler@draconx.ca \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox