From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, Alex Lyakas <alex@zadara.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: don't commit sunit/swidth updates to disk if that would cause repair failures
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:47:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213204715.GJ99875@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213174526.GH43376@bfoster>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:45:26PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 08:13:49AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Alex Lyakas reported[1] that mounting an xfs filesystem with new sunit
> > and swidth values could cause xfs_repair to fail loudly. The problem
> > here is that repair calculates the where mkfs should have allocated the
> > root inode, based on the superblock geometry. The allocation decisions
> > depend on sunit, which means that we really can't go updating sunit if
> > it would lead to a subsequent repair failure on an otherwise correct
> > filesystem.
> >
> > Port from xfs_repair some code that computes the location of the root
> > inode and teach mount to skip the ondisk update if it would cause
> > problems for repair. Along the way we'll update the documentation,
> > provide a function for computing the minimum AGFL size instead of
> > open-coding it, and cut down some indenting in the mount code.
> >
> > Note that we allow the mount to proceed (and new allocations will
> > reflect this new geometry) because we've never screened this kind of
> > thing before. We'll have to wait for a new future incompat feature to
> > enforce correct behavior, alas.
> >
> > Note that the geometry reporting always uses the superblock values, not
> > the incore ones, so that is what xfs_info and xfs_growfs will report.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191125130744.GA44777@bfoster/T/#m00f9594b511e076e2fcdd489d78bc30216d72a7d
> >
> > Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex@zadara.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > v2: refactor the agfl length calculations, clarify the fsgeometry ioctl
> > behavior, fix a bunch of the comments and make it clearer how we compute
> > the rootino location
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 18 ++++++---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.h | 1
> > fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 21 ++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.h
> > index 323592d563d5..72b3468b97b1 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.h
> ...
> > @@ -398,28 +431,26 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Update superblock with new values
> > - * and log changes
> > - */
> > - if (xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(sbp)) {
> > - if (sbp->sb_unit != mp->m_dalign) {
> > - sbp->sb_unit = mp->m_dalign;
> > - mp->m_update_sb = true;
> > - }
> > - if (sbp->sb_width != mp->m_swidth) {
> > - sbp->sb_width = mp->m_swidth;
> > - mp->m_update_sb = true;
> > - }
> > - } else {
> > + /* Update superblock with new values and log changes. */
> > + if (!xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(sbp)) {
> > xfs_warn(mp,
> > "cannot change alignment: superblock does not support data alignment");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > +
> > + if (sbp->sb_unit == mp->m_dalign &&
> > + sbp->sb_width == mp->m_swidth)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + xfs_check_new_dalign(mp, mp->m_dalign);
> > +
> > + sbp->sb_unit = mp->m_dalign;
> > + sbp->sb_width = mp->m_swidth;
> > + mp->m_update_sb = true;
>
> Isn't this supposed to conditionally update the superblock based on the
> rootino calculation?
D'oh. V3 it is then. :(
--D
> Brian
>
> > } else if ((mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_NOALIGN) != XFS_MOUNT_NOALIGN &&
> > xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > - mp->m_dalign = sbp->sb_unit;
> > - mp->m_swidth = sbp->sb_width;
> > + mp->m_dalign = sbp->sb_unit;
> > + mp->m_swidth = sbp->sb_width;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -647,16 +678,6 @@ xfs_mountfs(
> > mp->m_update_sb = true;
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Check if sb_agblocks is aligned at stripe boundary
> > - * If sb_agblocks is NOT aligned turn off m_dalign since
> > - * allocator alignment is within an ag, therefore ag has
> > - * to be aligned at stripe boundary.
> > - */
> > - error = xfs_update_alignment(mp);
> > - if (error)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > xfs_alloc_compute_maxlevels(mp);
> > xfs_bmap_compute_maxlevels(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> > xfs_bmap_compute_maxlevels(mp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> > @@ -664,6 +685,17 @@ xfs_mountfs(
> > xfs_rmapbt_compute_maxlevels(mp);
> > xfs_refcountbt_compute_maxlevels(mp);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Check if sb_agblocks is aligned at stripe boundary. If sb_agblocks
> > + * is NOT aligned turn off m_dalign since allocator alignment is within
> > + * an ag, therefore ag has to be aligned at stripe boundary. Note that
> > + * we must compute the free space and rmap btree geometry before doing
> > + * this.
> > + */
> > + error = xfs_update_alignment(mp);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > /* enable fail_at_unmount as default */
> > mp->m_fail_unmount = true;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > index c13bb3655e48..a86be7f807ee 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > @@ -3573,6 +3573,27 @@ DEFINE_KMEM_EVENT(kmem_alloc_large);
> > DEFINE_KMEM_EVENT(kmem_realloc);
> > DEFINE_KMEM_EVENT(kmem_zone_alloc);
> >
> > +TRACE_EVENT(xfs_check_new_dalign,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, int new_dalign, xfs_ino_t calc_rootino),
> > + TP_ARGS(mp, new_dalign, calc_rootino),
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(dev_t, dev)
> > + __field(int, new_dalign)
> > + __field(xfs_ino_t, sb_rootino)
> > + __field(xfs_ino_t, calc_rootino)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->dev = mp->m_super->s_dev;
> > + __entry->new_dalign = new_dalign;
> > + __entry->sb_rootino = mp->m_sb.sb_rootino;
> > + __entry->calc_rootino = calc_rootino;
> > + ),
> > + TP_printk("dev %d:%d new_dalign %d sb_rootino %llu calc_rootino %llu",
> > + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> > + __entry->new_dalign, __entry->sb_rootino,
> > + __entry->calc_rootino)
> > +)
> > +
> > #endif /* _TRACE_XFS_H */
> >
> > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-13 16:13 [PATCH v2] xfs: don't commit sunit/swidth updates to disk if that would cause repair failures Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-13 17:45 ` Brian Foster
2019-12-13 20:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191213204715.GJ99875@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=alex@zadara.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox