From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix log reservation overflows when allocating large rt extents
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:23:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191216122332.GA10536@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213201957.GI99875@magnolia>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:19:57PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:18:40AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > Omar Sandoval reported that a 4G fallocate on the realtime device causes
> > > filesystem shutdowns due to a log reservation overflow that happens when
> > > we log the rtbitmap updates. Factor rtbitmap/rtsummary updates into the
> > > the tr_write and tr_itruncate log reservation calculation.
> > >
> > > "The following reproducer results in a transaction log overrun warning
> > > for me:
> > >
> > > mkfs.xfs -f -r rtdev=/dev/vdc -d rtinherit=1 -m reflink=0 /dev/vdb
> > > mount -o rtdev=/dev/vdc /dev/vdb /mnt
> > > fallocate -l 4G /mnt/foo
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Looks reasonable enough given my limited knowledge on the rt bits. One
> > question..
> >
> > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > > index c55cd9a3dec9..824073a839ac 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > > @@ -196,6 +196,24 @@ xfs_calc_inode_chunk_res(
> > > return res;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Per-extent log reservation for the btree changes involved in freeing or
> > > + * allocating a realtime extent. We have to be able to log as many rtbitmap
> > > + * blocks as needed to mark inuse MAXEXTLEN blocks' worth of realtime extents,
> > > + * as well as the realtime summary block.
> > > + */
> > > +unsigned int
> > > +xfs_rtalloc_log_count(
> > > + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > > + unsigned int num_ops)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int blksz = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1);
> > > + unsigned int rtbmp_bytes;
> > > +
> > > + rtbmp_bytes = (MAXEXTLEN / mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize) / NBBY;
> > > + return (howmany(rtbmp_bytes, blksz) + 1) * num_ops;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Various log reservation values.
> > > *
> > > @@ -218,13 +236,21 @@ xfs_calc_inode_chunk_res(
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * In a write transaction we can allocate a maximum of 2
> > > - * extents. This gives:
> > > + * extents. This gives (t1):
> > > * the inode getting the new extents: inode size
> > > * the inode's bmap btree: max depth * block size
> > > * the agfs of the ags from which the extents are allocated: 2 * sector
> > > * the superblock free block counter: sector size
> > > * the allocation btrees: 2 exts * 2 trees * (2 * max depth - 1) * block size
> > > - * And the bmap_finish transaction can free bmap blocks in a join:
> > > + * Or, if we're writing to a realtime file (t2):
> > > + * the inode getting the new extents: inode size
> > > + * the inode's bmap btree: max depth * block size
> > > + * the agfs of the ags from which the extents are allocated: 2 * sector
> > > + * the superblock free block counter: sector size
> > > + * the realtime bitmap: ((MAXEXTLEN / rtextsize) / NBBY) bytes
> > > + * the realtime summary: 1 block
> > > + * the allocation btrees: 2 trees * (2 * max depth - 1) * block size
> >
> > Why do we include the allocation btrees in the rt reservations? I
> > thought that we'd either allocate (or free) out of one pool or the
> > other. Do we operate on both sets of structures in the same transaction?
>
> I read "allocation btrees: 2 exts * 2 trees..." for t1 to mean that we
> need to be able to allocate one datadev extent (which could cause a full
> bnobt/cntbt split) for the actual file data, and then the second extent is
> to handle allocating a new bmbt block to the bmap btree.
>
Ah, metadata out of the traditional trees.. that makes sense. My general
understanding is that we have two sets of free space and thus two
associated free space tracking structures: the traditional perag btrees
for the local device and some bitmap indexing scheme for the external
realtime device. Based on that, it looks like a file data allocation
falls down into xfs_bmap_rtalloc() to allocate data blocks via the RT
subsystem and the subsequent bmap update falls into the bmapbt code that
uses xfs_alloc_vextent() directly to allocate blocks for the bmbt.
With regard to the 2 extents, the first sentence in the comment above
suggests to me that the two extents is a per-transaction operational
limit. IOW, a write transaction supports two xfs_bmapi_write() calls,
for example, as opposed to referring to the two lower level allocations
outlined above. That seems consistent with the "2 * sector" AGF portion
of the reservation as well, but I could easily be wrong about that.
BTW I'm not following what you mean by a datadev extent causing a
bnobt/cntbt split. Doesn't the data extent come from the RT free space,
or are you just indirectly referring to the supporting bmbt block
allocation causing a split..?
> Based on that, I concluded that we still need to reserve space for that
> "second" extent to handle allocating a new bmbt block (on the datadev).
>
> While pondering that, I wondered if even that's really true because what
> happens if you suffer a full bmbt split, the free space is so fragmented
> that each level of the bmbt split ends up allocating a new block from a
> different part of the free space btrees and that in turn causes splits
> in the free space btrees?
>
> I think the answer is "no we're fine" because even if each new bmbt
> block comes from a different bnobt record, a full bmbt split will never
> hollow out more than half of one bnobt block's worth of free space
> records.
>
Yeah. I couldn't say for sure, but this strikes me as something we'd see
reports of if it were possible/likely to occur in practice, particularly
since this is the basis of how the allocation transaction reservations
are calculated in general (not just for RT).
Brian
> --D
>
> > Brian
> >
> > > + * And the bmap_finish transaction can free bmap blocks in a join (t3):
> > > * the agfs of the ags containing the blocks: 2 * sector size
> > > * the agfls of the ags containing the blocks: 2 * sector size
> > > * the super block free block counter: sector size
> > > @@ -234,40 +260,72 @@ STATIC uint
> > > xfs_calc_write_reservation(
> > > struct xfs_mount *mp)
> > > {
> > > - return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > > - max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
> > > + unsigned int t1, t2, t3;
> > > + unsigned int blksz = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1);
> > > +
> > > + t1 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK), blksz) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 2), blksz);
> > > +
> > > + if (xfs_sb_version_hasrealtime(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > + t2 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
> > > xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK),
> > > - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) +
> > > + blksz) +
> > > xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > - xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 2),
> > > - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
> > > - (xfs_calc_buf_res(5, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > - xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 2),
> > > - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_rtalloc_log_count(mp, 1), blksz) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 1), blksz);
> > > + } else {
> > > + t2 = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + t3 = xfs_calc_buf_res(5, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 2), blksz);
> > > +
> > > + return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * In truncating a file we free up to two extents at once. We can modify:
> > > + * In truncating a file we free up to two extents at once. We can modify (t1):
> > > * the inode being truncated: inode size
> > > * the inode's bmap btree: (max depth + 1) * block size
> > > - * And the bmap_finish transaction can free the blocks and bmap blocks:
> > > + * And the bmap_finish transaction can free the blocks and bmap blocks (t2):
> > > * the agf for each of the ags: 4 * sector size
> > > * the agfl for each of the ags: 4 * sector size
> > > * the super block to reflect the freed blocks: sector size
> > > * worst case split in allocation btrees per extent assuming 4 extents:
> > > * 4 exts * 2 trees * (2 * max depth - 1) * block size
> > > + * Or, if it's a realtime file (t3):
> > > + * the agf for each of the ags: 2 * sector size
> > > + * the agfl for each of the ags: 2 * sector size
> > > + * the super block to reflect the freed blocks: sector size
> > > + * the realtime bitmap: 2 exts * ((MAXEXTLEN / rtextsize) / NBBY) bytes
> > > + * the realtime summary: 2 exts * 1 block
> > > + * worst case split in allocation btrees per extent assuming 2 extents:
> > > + * 2 exts * 2 trees * (2 * max depth - 1) * block size
> > > */
> > > STATIC uint
> > > xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(
> > > struct xfs_mount *mp)
> > > {
> > > - return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > > - max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
> > > - xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK) + 1,
> > > - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
> > > - (xfs_calc_buf_res(9, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > - xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 4),
> > > - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
> > > + unsigned int t1, t2, t3;
> > > + unsigned int blksz = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1);
> > > +
> > > + t1 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK) + 1, blksz);
> > > +
> > > + t2 = xfs_calc_buf_res(9, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 4), blksz);
> > > +
> > > + if (xfs_sb_version_hasrealtime(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > + t3 = xfs_calc_buf_res(5, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_rtalloc_log_count(mp, 2), blksz) +
> > > + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 2), blksz);
> > > + } else {
> > > + t3 = 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-16 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 16:38 [PATCH] xfs: fix log reservation overflows when allocating large rt extents Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-05 19:23 ` Omar Sandoval
2019-12-12 23:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-13 12:18 ` Brian Foster
2019-12-13 20:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-16 12:23 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-12-16 16:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-16 18:00 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191216122332.GA10536@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox